From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261890AbUAMIJn (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:09:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261950AbUAMIJm (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:09:42 -0500 Received: from jaguar.mkp.net ([192.139.46.146]:13008 "EHLO jaguar.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261890AbUAMIJl (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:09:41 -0500 To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] allow SGI IOC4 chipset support References: <20040106010924.GA21747@sgi.com> <20040106102538.A14492@infradead.org> <20040112193844.B6991@infradead.org> From: Jes Sorensen Date: 13 Jan 2004 03:09:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040112193844.B6991@infradead.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig writes: Christoph> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:22:35AM -0500, Jes Sorensen Christoph> wrote: >> + snia_pciio_endian_set(dev, PCIDMA_ENDIAN_LITTLE, >> PCIDMA_ENDIAN_BIG); Christoph> Shouldn't we check for a failure here? We could, but I don't believe it can actually fail. Jes