From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:27:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:27:28 -0500 Received: from elixir.e.kth.se ([130.237.48.5]:13579 "EHLO elixir.e.kth.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Jan 2003 14:27:27 -0500 To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Why is Nvidia given GPL'd code to use in closed source drivers? References: From: mru@users.sourceforge.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Date: 01 Jan 2003 20:35:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: Paul Jakma's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:44:58 +0000 (GMT)" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Jakma writes: > PS: do you think Linux PPC or Alpha users are happy that NVidia > provide drivers? Being an Alpha user, I can assure you that for me nvidia's drivers are worth nothing. Even if they did work, I would want the complete specs for the chip. There's usually something you can do with them. -- Måns Rullgård mru@users.sf.net