From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265855AbTLIOA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:00:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265853AbTLIOA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:00:28 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:61915 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265855AbTLIOAX (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:00:23 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 15:00:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20031209115806.GA472@reti> <20031209134551.GG472@reti> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lO1BQQXW4bhoZbM24SaFLaDsFiY= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joe Thornber writes: >> I believe 2.6 is the right place for the device mapper. > > So what's the difference between a new filesystem like XFS and a new > device driver like dm ? None. Neither will go into 2.4, if I've understood things correctly. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se