From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261344AbTKXWlh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:41:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261376AbTKXWlh (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:41:37 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:34027 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261344AbTKXWlg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:41:36 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: What exactly are the issues with 2.6.0-test10 preempt? Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:41:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20031124222652.16351.qmail@web40910.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:x1X/2vP82MgMSHsUHl2EnE9HZmo= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bradley Chapman writes: > What sort of information would you like me to provide, sir? The bug > you're discussing here isn't affecting me; CONFIG_PREEMPT has been > solid on 2.6.0-test10. This is on a Gateway 600S laptop with a P4-M > 2Ghz processor and an i845 Brookdale chipset. I've been running 2.6.0-test10 for a few hours on my P4M Asus laptop. Playing music, editing files, compiling some things, some web surfing, no problems. Nothing unusual reported by the kernel. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se