From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1C7C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:41:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5E7A60F70 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:41:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org B5E7A60F70 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.linux.it Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442EF3C6AAC for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:41:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916933C69BB for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:41:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E6546006FA for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:41:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A93D218E1 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:41:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1635342080; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Iyp061MkxH7m/TuPv79Fwd6UV7UrgdQykeYIO5xWOUw=; b=pI/aJUl71OuidTg1fEKsaD226P0Fr6jtN3uvNVKZ2MI8UBNb7zZyHRjWixYu9x5PFSQ/BD 7X+8YlX8Q4rbGMwIutLesT0J76stHBOD/mywQylHCzScDzcHJnp1BRaA55KwWGk0XQeVgB JSPVsFj7osuvr3O8jDC4MO2+/wp98y4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1635342080; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Iyp061MkxH7m/TuPv79Fwd6UV7UrgdQykeYIO5xWOUw=; b=/aLwKW04kkd0wW7S0jOZX9AzbeFqCTluYmDies8qWbbhhwsMZKWr7gJX5ISYQwbQRaqEsn l9VeOZgzSFRQdlDg== Received: from g78 (unknown [10.163.24.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB6D4A3B83; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 13:41:19 +0000 (UTC) References: <20211018154800.11013-1-chrubis@suse.cz> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.5; emacs 27.2 From: Richard Palethorpe To: Cyril Hrubis Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:22:25 +0100 In-reply-to: <20211018154800.11013-1-chrubis@suse.cz> Message-ID: <87tuh2poue.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 0/7] docparse improvements X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: rpalethorpe@suse.de Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hello, Cyril Hrubis writes: > Implement support for various missing bits to the docparse tool and > enables it unconditionally so that the metadata.json file is present on > all builds. > > This is first part of bigger effort to get the metadata useful for the > testrunners, expecially we need the .test_variants field to be properly > parsed in order to compute the overall test runtime correctly. It's unfortunate that before starting this effort and the checker that we didn't know about tree-sitter (although Sparse may still be the best choice for the checker). Tree-sitter can parse C into an AST and can easily be vendored into LTP: https://tree-sitter.github.io/tree-sitter/using-parsers#building-the-library Then we just need to work on the level of the AST. It also has a query language. This should allow the initial matching to be done on a high level. If we continue down the path of hand parsing C, then it will most likely result in constant tweaks and additions. -- Thank you, Richard. -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp