Hi Petr, All,


Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Could we in the end accept this patch?
>
> It'd fix the issue for now and I could set size of the XFS loop device
> smaller
> than 300 MB (better for embedded). i.e. 16 MB (or 32 or 64 MB or anything
> higher
> if XFS developers are convinced it's needed).
>

I personally think YES!
(sorry for replying so late, I was on vacation last week)



>
> As I wrote before I plan to suggest sizes:
> btrfs 110 MB
> the rest (ext[234], xfs, ntfs, vfat, exfat, tmpfs): 16 MB
>

+1 thanks for finding the minimal size.

-- 
Regards,
Li Wang