From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAEAEFA3741 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117373CABF7 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:39:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (in-3.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E1E3C0FBC for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:39:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2001:67c:2178:6::1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-3.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464621A00243 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:39:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B97F1F8D2; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:39:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1667237976; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+X7XwnoeJz8aTw0+NsrbI69QQcWNtiUHqI1LHfT0Kp4=; b=xDj9sCLbzi7B48f8D2fBvAnRI6Qs5eWkfO8h3ylM5P33UXaVeY/DrG0cm+bK7BirUhWiMO BIp2dZ8F87klPy65YS1jZ6Xewi1Q56ldOv/uDW24TwyLVTW5Mpn2LhrguGIXRceqjKrLDQ TsqY+lmp/aZJjOBkL8UOGwHD/mhtom0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1667237976; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+X7XwnoeJz8aTw0+NsrbI69QQcWNtiUHqI1LHfT0Kp4=; b=Ug1I0/hHjA4OYq4EDCy8EewJm6lyGJA+4vW0OYegfN5i7VpE1NUw59bg3AdJuk2tPo/efQ ilDMTd56SWivilAg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0719413AAD; Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id QlFRNVcIYGNbXQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 31 Oct 2022 17:39:35 +0000 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 18:41:11 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Teo Couprie Diaz Message-ID: References: <20221027163654.414017-1-teo.coupriediaz@arm.com> <20221027163654.414017-2-teo.coupriediaz@arm.com> <99c55c0c-1f51-5282-6198-dbcb6d919ea3@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99c55c0c-1f51-5282-6198-dbcb6d919ea3@arm.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-3.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC PATCH 1/1] regen.sh: Use intptr_t for tst_syscall return X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > I agree, I wouldn't want to merge it. > As mentioned in the cover, I wanted to share the list of tests I have > tested the patch with, > both for people to test themselves if they want to and as a way to ask > if there was anything I missed > while testing with that. > I didn't really know how to share this, so I added it as part of the > commit for the RFC. Maybe it would > fit better as part of the cover letter ? Or after the commit description > with the shortlog ? > It might be better removed altogether and people can test with a larger > scope anyway ! Maybe just a separate patch with [DO NOT MERGE] in the tittle? -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp