From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23923C07E9D for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:43:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7D33CADDD for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:43:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [217.194.8.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4D63C1BC8 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:43:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E992960073A for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:43:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E46A21E87; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:43:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1664188989; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/rpv98c+GJ4Zsm5XHhYK3n/WYu86ee+zKBrrFbxTUyE=; b=fB/zzhuJnB4M21Jvb60c9CHpCvKNa4qHMwoH0fX7RtvCuloqE/CZjyxkeZSyBMGEas+97a eP8oKpxMISQIlQkum+uGA+D3jBkvYJnMqCF0FS4He06Z8ZOMF9y/ie9GBErhHjq68gE9s9 feQXqLaRDhRPk6xLnKXhQYrAZor/Hdg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1664188989; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=/rpv98c+GJ4Zsm5XHhYK3n/WYu86ee+zKBrrFbxTUyE=; b=610ukUAjxXdY7LPXKirUYfzCAx9sGF5gGISnUDX37XvipEZ7y1yKHUKFll+4q2MSxR6uxK s8+P8PoaCSXH1KCw== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE15013486; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id lkYyKDyCMWOmHAAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 10:43:08 +0000 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 12:43:06 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Cyril Hrubis Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] September LTP release X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: LTP List , Richard Palethorpe , Martin Doucha , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" > Hi! > > Well, if more than three people are involved in the release work, > > I think that the release workflow should be arranged in time order, > > otherwise, we're easily going to fall into chaos. e.g. > > Assumption work starting from the second week of the release month: > > 1. Collecting the patch list for a new release, like this email does (Cyril) > > 2. Reviewing and merging the patch list of step1 (All maintainers, > > LTP-users) > > 3. Pre-release widely testing, we need to explicitly post results in step1 > > email (Petr, Li Wang) > > 4. Tiny fix according to pre-release testing result (All maintainers, users) > > 5. Writing release note (Cyril) > > 6. Uploading tarballs (Petr) > > 7. Announcement email of LTP release (Cyril) > Lets move on with the plannig, I would say that we are done with step 2. > and we should move to step 3. +1 > Also I would go for a release date at the end of the month that is 30.9. +1 > Does everyone agree? -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp