Re: RCU consistency guarantees

[Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1662 bytes --]

----- On Dec 5, 2019, at 8:17 PM, Yuxin Ren <ryx@gwmail.gwu.edu> wrote: 

> Hi,
> I am a student, and learning RCU now, but still know very little about it.
> Are there any documents/papers/materials which (in)formally define and explain
> RCU consistency guarantees?

You may want to have a look at 

User-Level Implementations of Read-Copy Update 
Article in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 23(2):375 - 382 · March 2012 

as a starting point. 

Thanks, 

Mathieu 

> I know there are some consistency models in the database area (such as PRAM,
> Read Uncommitted, etc) from [ https://jepsen.io/consistency |
> https://jepsen.io/consistency ] and [1].
> How does RCU related to those consistency models?

> I also found some comments online (One key distinction is that both MVCC and RLU
> provide much stronger consistency guarantees to readers than does RCU ...) ( [
> https://lwn.net/Articles/777036/ | https://lwn.net/Articles/777036/ ] ).
> I do not understand how we reason/dresibe/compare the consistency guarantees. (
> I even do not know what consistency guarantees provided by RCU formally)
> Could someone explain this to me?

> [1] Bailis, P., Davidson, A., Fekete, A., Ghodsi, A., Hellerstein, J. M., &
> Stoica, I. (2013). Highly available transactions: Virtues and limitations.
> Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 7(3), 181-192.

> Thanks
> Yuxin

> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers 
EfficiOS Inc. 
http://www.efficios.com 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3173 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev