lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: gbastien+lttng@versatic.net, matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com,
	diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com,
	jgalar@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:52:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423205226.496-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)

Hi,

We noticed a few unspecified areas in the CTF 1.8.2 specification which
require some clarifications. We therefore plan to do a 1.8.3 release of
the specification including those changes.

Review is welcome,

Thanks,

Mathieu

Geneviève Bastien (1):
  Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined

Mathieu Desnoyers (2):
  Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
  Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values

 common-trace-format-specification.md | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

             reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23 20:52 Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev [this message]
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 22:51   ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40   ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08         ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50         ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50           ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42   ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200423205226.496-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \
    --cc=jgalar@efficios.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=pproulx@efficios.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3)' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).