lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3)
@ 2020-04-23 20:52 Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
  2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev @ 2020-04-23 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gbastien+lttng, matthew.khouzam, diamon-discuss, pproulx, jgalar
  Cc: lttng-dev

Hi,

We noticed a few unspecified areas in the CTF 1.8.2 specification which
require some clarifications. We therefore plan to do a 1.8.3 release of
the specification including those changes.

Review is welcome,

Thanks,

Mathieu

Geneviève Bastien (1):
  Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined

Mathieu Desnoyers (2):
  Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
  Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values

 common-trace-format-specification.md | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-29 16:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 22:51   ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40   ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08         ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50         ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50           ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42   ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).