lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: gbastien+lttng@versatic.net, matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com,
	diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org, pproulx@efficios.com,
	jgalar@efficios.com
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:52:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423205226.496-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423205226.496-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
---
 common-trace-format-specification.md | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common-trace-format-specification.md b/common-trace-format-specification.md
index f5fea51..53b70f4 100644
--- a/common-trace-format-specification.md
+++ b/common-trace-format-specification.md
@@ -836,10 +836,12 @@ TSDL metadata):
     range between these timestamps should include all event timestamps
     assigned to events contained within the packet. The timestamp at the
     beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
-    timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the end
-    of an event packet is guaranteed to be below or equal the
-    timestamps at the end of any following packet within the same stream.
-    See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
+    timestamp at the end of that event packet. The timestamp at the
+    beginning of an event packet is guaranteed to be above or equal the
+    timestamps at the beginning of any prior packet within the same
+    stream. The timestamp at the end of an event packet is guaranteed to
+    be below or equal the timestamps at the end of any following packet
+    within the same stream. See [Clocks](#spec8) for more detail.
   * **Events discarded count**. Snapshot of a per-stream
     free-running counter, counting the number of events discarded that
     were supposed to be written in the stream after the last event in
-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 20:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23 20:52 [RFC PATCH CTF 0/3] Common Trace Format Updates (upcoming 1.8.3) Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 1/3] Clarify that unlisted enum values are implementation-defined Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 22:51   ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-24 14:05       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40   ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:40     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:51       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 12:08         ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50         ` Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-29 16:50           ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev [this message]
2020-04-28 18:42   ` [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:42     ` [lttng-dev] " Philippe Proulx via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54     ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-28 18:54       ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-04-23 20:52 ` [RFC PATCH CTF 3/3] Clarify that timestamp begin/end need to be complete clock values Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200423205226.496-3-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=diamon-discuss@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gbastien+lttng@versatic.net \
    --cc=jgalar@efficios.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=matthew.khouzam@ericsson.com \
    --cc=pproulx@efficios.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH CTF 2/3] Clarify monotonicity requirement on timestamp begin' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).