* process/thread-specific UST tracing
@ 2020-05-15 17:16 Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 17:16 ` [lttng-dev] " Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev @ 2020-05-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lttng-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 746 bytes --]
I am tracing a multiprocess/multithreaded code (MPI/OpenMP) using
lttng-ust. Right now, I need to include process id and thread id for each
event in order to generate process/thread indexed view of the traces. Is
there a way that I can store per-process events into a specific buffer
without mixing the events with other events that are generated on the same
CPU? The same thing for per-thread events, I would like lttng or CTF to
allow to store per-thread events in a specific buffer without mixing the
events with other events on the same CPU channel. With that feature, I do
not need to store process id and thread id in each event and then need to
query all the events in order to collect per-process or per-thread event.
Thank you
Yonghong
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1169 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [lttng-dev] process/thread-specific UST tracing
2020-05-15 17:16 process/thread-specific UST tracing Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
@ 2020-05-15 17:16 ` Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev @ 2020-05-15 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lttng-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 746 bytes --]
I am tracing a multiprocess/multithreaded code (MPI/OpenMP) using
lttng-ust. Right now, I need to include process id and thread id for each
event in order to generate process/thread indexed view of the traces. Is
there a way that I can store per-process events into a specific buffer
without mixing the events with other events that are generated on the same
CPU? The same thing for per-thread events, I would like lttng or CTF to
allow to store per-thread events in a specific buffer without mixing the
events with other events on the same CPU channel. With that feature, I do
not need to store process id and thread id in each event and then need to
query all the events in order to collect per-process or per-thread event.
Thank you
Yonghong
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1169 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: process/thread-specific UST tracing
2020-05-15 17:16 process/thread-specific UST tracing Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 17:16 ` [lttng-dev] " Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
@ 2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 19:15 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev @ 2020-05-15 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonghong Yan; +Cc: lttng-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1365 bytes --]
----- On May 15, 2020, at 1:16 PM, lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> wrote:
> I am tracing a multiprocess/multithreaded code (MPI/OpenMP) using lttng-ust.
> Right now, I need to include process id and thread id for each event in order
> to generate process/thread indexed view of the traces. Is there a way that I
> can store per-process events into a specific buffer without mixing the events
> with other events that are generated on the same CPU? The same thing for
> per-thread events, I would like lttng or CTF to allow to store per-thread
> events in a specific buffer without mixing the events with other events on the
> same CPU channel. With that feature, I do not need to store process id and
> thread id in each event and then need to query all the events in order to
> collect per-process or per-thread event.
No, but you can use kernel tracing (lttng-modules) of the scheduler events (sched:*) to map
the CPU number to the currently running thread and process at trace post-processing.
By doing so, both current thread and process become implicit with the CPU number.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Thank you
> Yonghong
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2529 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [lttng-dev] process/thread-specific UST tracing
2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
@ 2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev @ 2020-05-15 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yonghong Yan; +Cc: lttng-dev
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1365 bytes --]
----- On May 15, 2020, at 1:16 PM, lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> wrote:
> I am tracing a multiprocess/multithreaded code (MPI/OpenMP) using lttng-ust.
> Right now, I need to include process id and thread id for each event in order
> to generate process/thread indexed view of the traces. Is there a way that I
> can store per-process events into a specific buffer without mixing the events
> with other events that are generated on the same CPU? The same thing for
> per-thread events, I would like lttng or CTF to allow to store per-thread
> events in a specific buffer without mixing the events with other events on the
> same CPU channel. With that feature, I do not need to store process id and
> thread id in each event and then need to query all the events in order to
> collect per-process or per-thread event.
No, but you can use kernel tracing (lttng-modules) of the scheduler events (sched:*) to map
the CPU number to the currently running thread and process at trace post-processing.
By doing so, both current thread and process become implicit with the CPU number.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> Thank you
> Yonghong
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2529 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-05-15 19:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-15 17:16 process/thread-specific UST tracing Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 17:16 ` [lttng-dev] " Yonghong Yan via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 19:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-05-15 19:15 ` [lttng-dev] " Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).