lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: 熊毓华 <xiongyuhua@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Some confusion about cpu usage of the lttng-consumerd process
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 09:05:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127140548.GB3947@joraj-alpa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40a80cf.2b99.176086d97b1.Coremail.xiongyuhua@zju.edu.cn>

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 02:39:28PM +0800, 熊毓华 via lttng-dev wrote:
> Hi,dear.
> 
> I have been using lttng to monitor my server these days,but I found something interesting.
> 
> The cpu usage of lttng varies with the number of cpu cores of the server.

Which is a bit expected since more CPU means more "data" source from the point
of view of lttng hence more "work" overall.

> 
> On the server, I create a tracing session in live mode, using "lttng create my-session --live". 
> 
> Then,I Start the babeltrace2 and configure it to connect to the relay daemon,using "--input-format=lttng-live" mode.
> 
> I used 5 cloud servers,1core4G 2core8G 4core16G 8core16G 8core16G.
> 
> And,the same test script was executed above to provide the same workload.

We would need the test script to have some context here of the workload.

> 
> As we all know,lttng has 5 processes,
> 
> 1.lttng-runas    --daemonize
> 
> 2.lttng-runas      -k --consumerd-cmd-sock /var/run/lttng/kconsumerd/command --consumerd-err-sock /var/run/lttng/kconsumerd/error --group tracing

Based on this you are performing kernel tracing.

> 
> 3.lttng-sessiond --daemonize
> 
> 4.lttng-relayd -L tcp://localhost:5344
> 
> 5.lttng-consumerd  -k --consumerd-cmd-sock /var/run/lttng/kconsumerd/command --consumerd-err-sock /var/run/lttng/kconsumerd/error --group tracing
> 
> 
> The CPU usage of the first four processes is below 2% on the 5 servers,but the lttng-consumerd process is different.
> 
> On 1-core、2-core、4-core servers,the CPU usage of the lttng-consumerd process is below 2%.

How is the cpu usage measured here?

> 
> But on two 8-core machines, the cpu usage of the lttng-consumerd process reached 10% or more.

Consumerd is responsible of "fetching" data from the ring buffers and "saving"
it either locally (trace on disk) or remotely (streaming/live session). CPU usage
should be a bit correlated with the event production rate. Did you have a look at the
number of events generated for a similar interval?

> And,the cpu usage of the babeltrace process is not much different,just the cpu usage of the lttng-consumerd process varies with the number of cpu cores of the server.
> 
> Why it is like this?How should this phenomenon be analyzed?
> 
> Looking forward to your reply.
> 
> thanks,
> yuhua
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev


-- 
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-27 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27  6:39 [lttng-dev] Some confusion about cpu usage of the lttng-consumerd process 熊毓华 via lttng-dev
2020-11-27 14:05 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev [this message]
2020-11-27 15:32   ` 熊毓华 via lttng-dev
2020-11-27 16:04     ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev
2020-11-27 17:11       ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev
2020-11-28  6:49       ` 熊毓华 via lttng-dev
2020-11-30 14:24         ` Mathieu Desnoyers via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201127140548.GB3947@joraj-alpa \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com \
    --cc=xiongyuhua@zju.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).