lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eqbal via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
Subject: [lttng-dev] lttng live event loss with babeltrace2
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 17:05:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPj=WkjEZN+_NgrnF3djfF_jCyp+D195e+KpzqzAK9kfmrTu6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1299 bytes --]

Hi,

I have a lttng live session trace consumer application using libbabeltrace2
where I create a graph to consume lttng live session traces and output to
another sink. I am running the graph in a loop at some polling interval as
long as I get BT_GRAPH_RUN_STATUS_AGAIN status. What I am noticing is that
if my polling interval is large enough I tend to lose either all or some of
the events. I experimented with various polling intervals and it seems if
the polling interval is less than *DELAYUS *from "lttng-create
--live=DELAYUS" option then I am able to get all the events, otherwise I
tend to lose events.

Here are the steps I follow:
1. start session daemon and relay daemon
2. create a live session (with default delay of 1s), enable events and start
3. Start my application (hello world example from lttng docs)
4. Start the consumer application built using libbabeltrace that connects
to the live session

I noticed that the events are actually persisted in the ~/lttng-traces by
the relay daemon, but it does not reach babeltrace consumer application. I
have noticed the same behavior with babeltrace2 cli.

I would like to understand what is the reason for such behavior and if
playing with the polling interval in relation to the DELAYUS value is the
right thing to do.

Thanks,
Eqbal

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1561 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-04  0:05 Eqbal via lttng-dev [this message]
2021-05-04 13:16 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev
2021-05-04 14:44 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev
2021-05-07 18:05 ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev
2021-05-11  0:35   ` Eqbal via lttng-dev
2021-05-11  1:14     ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien via lttng-dev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPj=WkjEZN+_NgrnF3djfF_jCyp+D195e+KpzqzAK9kfmrTu6Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=eqbalzee@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: [lttng-dev] lttng live event loss with babeltrace2' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).