lttng-dev.lists.lttng.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 杨海 <hai.yang@magic-shield.com>
To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
Subject: Re: 回复:Re:  回复:Re:  Pros and Cons of LTTng
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 08:34:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tencent_3F4BC66C590FBA9B49519E62__20419.1765211121$1564447872$gmane$org@qq.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <438504875.11742.1564069712337.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2797 bytes --]

Hi Mathieu,

Thanks. I am looking for packages for older distributions like CentOS 6 (with kernel 2.6) but could not find it. And which kernel version is minimum requirement for LTTng?


Regards
Hai






------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "Mathieu Desnoyers"<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>;
Date:  Thu, Jul 25, 2019 11:48 PM
To:  "杨海"<hai.yang@magic-shield.com>; 
Cc:  "Jonathan Rajotte"<jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com>; "lttng-dev"<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>; 
Subject:  Re: [lttng-dev] 回复:Re:  回复:Re:  Pros and Cons of LTTng

 

----- On Jul 25, 2019, at 4:21 PM, 杨海 <hai.yang@magic-shield.com> wrote:

Hi

Thanks for quick response. 
LTTng is really impressive on performance,especially under heavy workload. When using it on critical machines,stability is also essential. 
I wonder how LTTng is commercialized and any products or OS distributions already enabled it. 
I took a look at lttng-modules bug list,there are a few kernel oops years ago and got resolved. May I say it is very stable or it has not been fully tested? 


Hi,



EfficiOS has had commercial customers using LTTng in production for many years now.
LTTng per-se is distributed as packages in all major Linux distributions. EfficiOS also provides

more up-to-date packages for some distributions through http://packages.efficios.com/


The way we commercialize LTTng is through funding for design and implementation of
customer's feature requests. We also provide commercial support tailored to specific
customer's environments, which includes SLA and continuous integration testing of specific
environments.



If those are services you are interested in, please feel free to contact us in private so we
can further discuss your needs.



Best regards,



Mathieu



regards
Hai






--------------原始邮件--------------
发件人:"Jonathan Rajotte-Julien "<jonathan.rajotte-julien@efficios.com>;
发送时间:2019年7月23日(星期二) 上午6:20
收件人:"杨海" <hai.yang@magic-shield.com>;
抄送:"lttng-dev "<lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>;
主题:Re:  回复:Re: [lttng-dev] Pros and Cons of LTTng
-----------------------------------

 Hi,

> As to LD_PRELOAD, it is also used for privilege escalation. Will it be regarded as vulnerability and forbidden on some Linux systems?

It could yes.
In that case you will be limited to the syscalls interface for the libc
observability unless you instrument it and distribute it.

Cheers.



_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev



-- 

Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5204 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 156 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tencent_264479D416B7725164217DB5@qq.com>
2019-07-25 15:45 ` 回复:Re: 回复:Re: Pros and Cons of LTTng Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
     [not found] ` <20190725154514.GA9592@joraj-alpa>
2019-07-25 15:48   ` Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
2019-07-25 15:48 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
     [not found] ` <438504875.11742.1564069712337.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2019-07-30  0:34   ` 杨海 [this message]
     [not found]   ` <tencent_3F4BC66C590FBA9B49519E62@qq.com>
2019-07-30 14:04     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2019-07-25 15:21 杨海

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='tencent_3F4BC66C590FBA9B49519E62__20419.1765211121$1564447872$gmane$org@qq.com' \
    --to=hai.yang@magic-shield.com \
    --cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).