From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 0/3] proc: Relax check of mount visibility
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 09:44:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1zgzwm7iv.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1613550081.git.gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> (Alexey Gladkov's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:21:40 +0100")
Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com> writes:
> If only the dynamic part of procfs is mounted (subset=pid), then there is no
> need to check if procfs is fully visible to the user in the new user
> namespace.
A couple of things.
1) Allowing the mount should come in the last patch. So we don't have a
bisect hazard.
2) We should document that we still require a mount of proc to match on
atime and readonly mount attributes.
3) If we can find a way to safely not require a previous mount of proc
this will be much more valuable.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-17 8:21 [RESEND PATCH v4 0/3] proc: Relax check of mount visibility Alexey Gladkov
2021-02-17 8:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 1/3] " Alexey Gladkov
2021-02-17 8:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 2/3] proc: Show /proc/self/net only for CAP_NET_ADMIN Alexey Gladkov
2021-02-17 8:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 3/3] proc: Disable cancellation of subset=pid option Alexey Gladkov
2021-02-22 15:44 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-03-10 18:22 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 0/3] proc: Relax check of mount visibility Alexey Gladkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1zgzwm7iv.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=legion@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.