From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: [patch 054/118] mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages() Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:14:04 -0800 Message-ID: <20200131061404.vx-936iUB%akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200130221021.5f0211c56346d5485af07923@linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33768 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725907AbgAaGOH (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jan 2020 01:14:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200130221021.5f0211c56346d5485af07923@linux-foundation.org> Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, arunks@codeaurora.org, cai@lca.pw, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com, glider@google.com, kernelfans@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, mhocko@suse.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, osalvador@suse.de, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, richardw.yang@linux.intel.com, rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz From: David Hildenbrand Subject: mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages() Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0. Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Pingfan Liu Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Alexander Duyck Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Arun KS Cc: Michael Ellerman Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/linux/page-isolation.h | 4 ++-- mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +- mm/page_alloc.c | 21 +++++++-------------- mm/page_isolation.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages +++ a/include/linux/page-isolation.h @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(in #define MEMORY_OFFLINE 0x1 #define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2 -bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, - int migratetype, int flags); +bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype, + int flags); void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype); int move_freepages_block(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype, int *num_movable); --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages +++ a/mm/memory_hotplug.c @@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ static bool is_pageblock_removable_noloc if (!zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn)) return false; - return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, + return !has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE, MEMORY_OFFLINE); } --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -8180,17 +8180,15 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(con /* * This function checks whether pageblock includes unmovable pages or not. - * If @count is not zero, it is okay to include less @count unmovable pages * * PageLRU check without isolation or lru_lock could race so that * MIGRATE_MOVABLE block might include unmovable pages. And __PageMovable * check without lock_page also may miss some movable non-lru pages at * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact. */ -bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int count, - int migratetype, int flags) +bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype, + int flags) { - unsigned long found; unsigned long iter = 0; unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page); const char *reason = "unmovable page"; @@ -8216,13 +8214,11 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo goto unmovable; } - for (found = 0; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) { - unsigned long check = pfn + iter; - - if (!pfn_valid_within(check)) + for (; iter < pageblock_nr_pages; iter++) { + if (!pfn_valid_within(pfn + iter)) continue; - page = pfn_to_page(check); + page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter); if (PageReserved(page)) goto unmovable; @@ -8271,11 +8267,9 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo if ((flags & MEMORY_OFFLINE) && PageHWPoison(page)) continue; - if (__PageMovable(page)) + if (__PageMovable(page) || PageLRU(page)) continue; - if (!PageLRU(page)) - found++; /* * If there are RECLAIMABLE pages, we need to check * it. But now, memory offline itself doesn't call @@ -8289,8 +8283,7 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel * page at boot. */ - if (found > count) - goto unmovable; + goto unmovable; } return false; unmovable: --- a/mm/page_isolation.c~mm-remove-count-parameter-from-has_unmovable_pages +++ a/mm/page_isolation.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struc * FIXME: Now, memory hotplug doesn't call shrink_slab() by itself. * We just check MOVABLE pages. */ - if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, 0, migratetype, isol_flags)) { + if (!has_unmovable_pages(zone, page, migratetype, isol_flags)) { unsigned long nr_pages; int mt = get_pageblock_migratetype(page); _