From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: [patch 11/93] c6x: add show_stack_loglvl() Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 21:30:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20200609043029.rjLWT6jSK%akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20200608212922.5b7fa74ca3f4e2444441b7f9@linux-foundation.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53234 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726896AbgFIEaa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:30:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200608212922.5b7fa74ca3f4e2444441b7f9@linux-foundation.org> Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dima@arista.com, jacquiot.aurelien@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, msalter@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org From: Dmitry Safonov Subject: c6x: add show_stack_loglvl() Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-12-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot Cc: Mark Salter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- arch/c6x/kernel/traps.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/arch/c6x/kernel/traps.c~c6x-add-show_stack_loglvl +++ a/arch/c6x/kernel/traps.c @@ -344,12 +344,13 @@ asmlinkage int process_exception(struct static int kstack_depth_to_print = 48; -static void show_trace(unsigned long *stack, unsigned long *endstack) +static void show_trace(unsigned long *stack, unsigned long *endstack, + const char *loglvl) { unsigned long addr; int i; - pr_debug("Call trace:"); + printk("%sCall trace:", loglvl); i = 0; while (stack + 1 <= endstack) { addr = *stack++; @@ -364,16 +365,17 @@ static void show_trace(unsigned long *st if (__kernel_text_address(addr)) { #ifndef CONFIG_KALLSYMS if (i % 5 == 0) - pr_debug("\n "); + printk("%s\n ", loglvl); #endif - pr_debug(" [<%08lx>] %pS\n", addr, (void *)addr); + printk("%s [<%08lx>] %pS\n", loglvl, addr, (void *)addr); i++; } } - pr_debug("\n"); + printk("%s\n", loglvl); } -void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) +void show_stack_loglvl(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack, + const char *loglvl) { unsigned long *p, *endstack; int i; @@ -398,7 +400,12 @@ void show_stack(struct task_struct *task pr_cont(" %08lx", *p++); } pr_cont("\n"); - show_trace(stack, endstack); + show_trace(stack, endstack, loglvl); +} + +void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *stack) +{ + show_stack_loglvl(task, stack, KERN_DEBUG); } int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr) _