mm-commits.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: cl@linux.com, guro@fb.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com,
	jannh@google.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, penberg@kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, vbabka@suse.cz, vjitta@codeaurora.org
Subject: [merged] mm-slub-extend-checks-guarded-by-slub_debug-static-key.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2020 19:35:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200810023511.jmEQMwQBv%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: mm, slub: extend checks guarded by slub_debug static key
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-slub-extend-checks-guarded-by-slub_debug-static-key.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree

------------------------------------------------------
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: mm, slub: extend checks guarded by slub_debug static key

There are few more places in SLUB that could benefit from reduced overhead
of the static key introduced by a previous patch:

- setup_object_debug() called on each object in newly allocated slab page
- setup_page_debug() called on newly allocated slab page
- __free_slab() called on freed slab page

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200610163135.17364-9-vbabka@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Vijayanand Jitta <vjitta@codeaurora.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/slub.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/slub.c~mm-slub-extend-checks-guarded-by-slub_debug-static-key
+++ a/mm/slub.c
@@ -1131,7 +1131,7 @@ static inline void dec_slabs_node(struct
 static void setup_object_debug(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 								void *object)
 {
-	if (!(s->flags & (SLAB_STORE_USER|SLAB_RED_ZONE|__OBJECT_POISON)))
+	if (!kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_STORE_USER|SLAB_RED_ZONE|__OBJECT_POISON))
 		return;
 
 	init_object(s, object, SLUB_RED_INACTIVE);
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static void setup_object_debug(struct km
 static
 void setup_page_debug(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *addr)
 {
-	if (!(s->flags & SLAB_POISON))
+	if (!kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_POISON))
 		return;
 
 	metadata_access_enable();
@@ -1853,7 +1853,7 @@ static void __free_slab(struct kmem_cach
 	int order = compound_order(page);
 	int pages = 1 << order;
 
-	if (s->flags & SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS) {
+	if (kmem_cache_debug_flags(s, SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS)) {
 		void *p;
 
 		slab_pad_check(s, page);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from vbabka@suse.cz are



                 reply	other threads:[~2020-08-10  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200810023511.jmEQMwQBv%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vjitta@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).