From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E65DC433E0 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61137207F7 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597266107; bh=fhn6B8M43ARvwg98jH23RLT5oXhya/K4BgBanhIYDd0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=e6Y945i/eiwKZY0IkYfJu12f5rRe5vnj7Q7WktWx7nlXMb40J04eltg1o4UfuLUDX qqRQ1kbhMlvMqbpTkzVi2TmF4pr8TKLhGpZMx6sDGSnHWXGAvVXvyRw4fqrfoXltFJ dbGHy+112REJzIU64259MSHzWpVRzVldMgpWTv7o= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726622AbgHLVBr (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:01:47 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47208 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726611AbgHLVBq (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:01:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-71-198-47-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.47.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FCFF2078B; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597266106; bh=fhn6B8M43ARvwg98jH23RLT5oXhya/K4BgBanhIYDd0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=obJzr5q5IJVXZ/jCYjJ2S6U3d86d5/fQ0JZc5OYj+jDWKOjYBUFMpNIbjPVsGqNSI xYoqUkB0tLe0bgSh65cN2s2if6vSxlk+DL1+AgFLnMEBuIuBt3m1asMvlPKOPWdPCn ePZ9uzWcjQxiDYciHVflH2rz+YTTn4k3/o0ny75M= Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:01:46 -0700 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, haowenchao22@gmail.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: [merged] mm-mempolicy-check-parameters-first-in-kernel_get_mempolicy.patch removed from -mm tree Message-ID: <20200812210146.yXsKuc4e-%akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: mm/mempolicy.c: check parameters first in kernel_get_mempolicy has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-mempolicy-check-parameters-first-in-kernel_get_mempolicy.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Wenchao Hao Subject: mm/mempolicy.c: check parameters first in kernel_get_mempolicy Previous implementatoin calls untagged_addr() before error check, while if the error check failed and return EINVAL, the untagged_addr() call is just useless work. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200801090825.5597-1-haowenchao22@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/mempolicy.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/mm/mempolicy.c~mm-mempolicy-check-parameters-first-in-kernel_get_mempolicy +++ a/mm/mempolicy.c @@ -1632,11 +1632,11 @@ static int kernel_get_mempolicy(int __us int pval; nodemask_t nodes; - addr = untagged_addr(addr); - if (nmask != NULL && maxnode < nr_node_ids) return -EINVAL; + addr = untagged_addr(addr); + err = do_get_mempolicy(&pval, &nodes, addr, flags); if (err) _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from haowenchao22@gmail.com are