From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2429EC433E0 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F2E2078B for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:03:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597266185; bh=juJBPwWqsReU/rtgo3zlEkCmtKHPRKTMOT2OD9CKwsU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=lxxdtEctUlER5AKpEVW4Z83Ap2l5hc32JwoYf3xjZ3mEI7YGqq6lYVyNg9a6RBdqa FvEZyIzOQhCrdlNv7TkwzjUJRrTmNgtacGVgzrAMgakTI/jMSnmhSdWJH3IGAmi43v RDJTEuQoOBB/jigeo6P+Y+7jDKjj1HJSxkBktk44= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726612AbgHLVDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:03:04 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51916 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726557AbgHLVDE (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:03:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-71-198-47-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.47.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73E8120774; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:03:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1597266183; bh=juJBPwWqsReU/rtgo3zlEkCmtKHPRKTMOT2OD9CKwsU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=MvKmQ892myESoErNlDbpMfMd0O2cWta3DGYBjbgWJ+lEv09+WrQo3q+YGSlAd+f75 C7TQva+VyTaAfd+87P6+fyTUHdZA1hWWLOrk+bM1cZS6u+ToDaCS/sG8Wf6+wHanuq Iz5tAN+/A+iGvPguClHYIMM/99jt+zuX4+p8SQrQ= Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:03:03 -0700 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org, ziy@nvidia.com Subject: [merged] mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words.patch removed from -mm tree Message-ID: <20200812210303.4GEpfr1F3%akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: delete or fix duplicated words has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Randy Dunlap Subject: mm/page_alloc.c: delete or fix duplicated words Drop the repeated word "them" and "that". Change "the the" to "to the". Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200801173822.14973-10-rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/page_alloc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_allocc-delete-or-fix-duplicated-words +++ a/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -4282,7 +4282,7 @@ retry: /* * If an allocation failed after direct reclaim, it could be because * pages are pinned on the per-cpu lists or in high alloc reserves. - * Shrink them them and try again + * Shrink them and try again */ if (!page && !drained) { unreserve_highatomic_pageblock(ac, false); @@ -6192,7 +6192,7 @@ static int zone_batchsize(struct zone *z * locking. * * Any new users of pcp->batch and pcp->high should ensure they can cope with - * those fields changing asynchronously (acording the the above rule). + * those fields changing asynchronously (acording to the above rule). * * mutex_is_locked(&pcp_batch_high_lock) required when calling this function * outside of boot time (or some other assurance that no concurrent updaters @@ -8203,7 +8203,7 @@ void *__init alloc_large_system_hash(con * race condition. So you can't expect this function should be exact. * * Returns a page without holding a reference. If the caller wants to - * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that that it + * dereference that page (e.g., dumping), it has to make sure that it * cannot get removed (e.g., via memory unplug) concurrently. * */ _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from rdunlap@infradead.org are