+ mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch added to -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The patch titled
     Subject: mm/page_alloc: tweak comments in has_unmovable_pages()
has been added to the -mm tree.  Its filename is
     mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch

This patch should soon appear at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch
and later at
    http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/page_alloc: tweak comments in has_unmovable_pages()

Patch series "mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE", v5.

When introducing virtio-mem, the semantics of ZONE_MOVABLE were rather
unclear, which is why we special-cased ZONE_MOVABLE such that partially
plugged blocks would never end up in ZONE_MOVABLE.

Now that the semantics are much clearer (and are documented in patch #6),
let's support partially plugged memory blocks in ZONE_MOVABLE, allowing
partially plugged memory blocks to be online to ZONE_MOVABLE and also
unplugging from such memory blocks.  This avoids surprises when onlining
of memory blocks suddenly fails, just because they are not completely
populated by virtio-mem (yet).

This is especially helpful for testing, but also paves the way for
virtio-mem optimizations, allowing more memory to get reliably unplugged.

Cleanup has_unmovable_pages() and set_migratetype_isolate(), providing
better documentation of how ZONE_MOVABLE interacts with different kind of
unmovable pages (memory offlining vs.  alloc_contig_range()).


This patch (of 6):

Let's move the split comment regarding bootmem allocations and memory
holes, especially in the context of ZONE_MOVABLE, to the PageReserved()
check.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-1-david@redhat.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/page_alloc.c |   22 ++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/page_alloc.c~mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages
+++ a/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -8219,14 +8219,6 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct
 	unsigned long iter = 0;
 	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
 
-	/*
-	 * TODO we could make this much more efficient by not checking every
-	 * page in the range if we know all of them are in MOVABLE_ZONE and
-	 * that the movable zone guarantees that pages are migratable but
-	 * the later is not the case right now unfortunatelly. E.g. movablecore
-	 * can still lead to having bootmem allocations in zone_movable.
-	 */
-
 	if (is_migrate_cma_page(page)) {
 		/*
 		 * CMA allocations (alloc_contig_range) really need to mark
@@ -8245,6 +8237,12 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct
 
 		page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
 
+		/*
+		 * Both, bootmem allocations and memory holes are marked
+		 * PG_reserved and are unmovable. We can even have unmovable
+		 * allocations inside ZONE_MOVABLE, for example when
+		 * specifying "movablecore".
+		 */
 		if (PageReserved(page))
 			return page;
 
@@ -8318,14 +8316,6 @@ struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct
 		 * it.  But now, memory offline itself doesn't call
 		 * shrink_node_slabs() and it still to be fixed.
 		 */
-		/*
-		 * If the page is not RAM, page_count()should be 0.
-		 * we don't need more check. This is an _used_ not-movable page.
-		 *
-		 * The problematic thing here is PG_reserved pages. PG_reserved
-		 * is set to both of a memory hole page and a _used_ kernel
-		 * page at boot.
-		 */
 		return page;
 	}
 	return NULL;
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from david@redhat.com are

mm-page_alloc-tweak-comments-in-has_unmovable_pages.patch
mm-page_isolation-exit-early-when-pageblock-is-isolated-in-set_migratetype_isolate.patch
mm-page_isolation-drop-warn_on_once-in-set_migratetype_isolate.patch
mm-page_isolation-cleanup-set_migratetype_isolate.patch
virtio-mem-dont-special-case-zone_movable.patch
mm-document-semantics-of-zone_movable.patch