From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70C5C433E1 for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:48:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8133A2076E for ; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:48:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598053725; bh=FREbTn2bClyjM/HVdiuadQDpULbl829d1eZ1Ks5e5HM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=sno8AsbWJTQm8CQMCFyo6kg2UdimLJK9TtxeAPWsJWSrQ4RntMdgX8kEmQtQzWAvi 07IbmcSJdczfhb0nTQ5Fbz40uUIAZ4teNlfJmF/JuObNWi2EO29UzZakxJ4PE+Efol 8999XQJ5ckSJ5iSJ5hBw2NKV+oyAL7JoEJ4kY9w0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726719AbgHUXso (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:48:44 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60240 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726706AbgHUXso (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:48:44 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9ADEA2067C; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 23:48:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1598053723; bh=FREbTn2bClyjM/HVdiuadQDpULbl829d1eZ1Ks5e5HM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=PhuKqKluUJpKqKEPqYps4LDpX1izNH3SDcEemd/M7LngFmg5h+NKmFsitzceykzi8 5HY5GzBmCwHC9OR1ecvhB/rszertxlXFOayoRmgkTPYE37ieT7lNoBjAJB9ZBdi+b/ MMWH8gCkMvJl8MmAk4v+3RLgkDH9Z/Wd0TDocRCA= Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 16:48:43 -0700 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org To: ckennelly@google.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: + =?US-ASCII?Q?fs-binfmt=5Felf-use-pt=5Fload-p=5Falign-values-for-suitabl?= =?US-ASCII?Q?e-start-address-v4.patch?= added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20200821234843.KAsipP4rO%akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: mm-commits-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4 has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4.patch This patch should soon appear at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4.patch and later at https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4.patch Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated there every 3-4 working days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Chris Kennelly Subject: fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4 augment comment Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200821233848.3904680-2-ckennelly@google.com Signed-off-by: Chris Kennelly Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- fs/binfmt_elf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/binfmt_elf.c~fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4 +++ a/fs/binfmt_elf.c @@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static unsigned long maximum_alignment(s if (cmds[i].p_type == PT_LOAD) { unsigned long p_align = cmds[i].p_align; - /* skip non-power of two alignments */ + /* skip non-power of two alignments as invalid */ if (!is_power_of_2(p_align)) continue; alignment = max(alignment, p_align); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from ckennelly@google.com are fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address.patch fs-binfmt_elf-use-pt_load-p_align-values-for-suitable-start-address-v4.patch add-self-test-for-verifying-load-alignment.patch