From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC592C43464 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 04:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8770922211 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 04:20:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600489238; bh=c/5YX7/XsB50Z9xLC1/TiX160ykBQL44OxtocA/8dN8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=rFwKo7AY6ef/G9qzj0mIl2PNpV3elKBnaWL/BFwu6krhmNXa5Oor1s71oALDt4r8K L568i0DdPFaYuG+BaQMciE3aKIaH+V869vtREfKyAWGSd/biQLOQ/nUJBfU7ujDWwD o/U1Fwec3NfT8TsRU9cKSiz7PPOWsr+ozDjhBXD8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726250AbgISEUi (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:20:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55194 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726009AbgISEUi (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Sep 2020 00:20:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-71-198-47-131.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [71.198.47.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FB7C21D43; Sat, 19 Sep 2020 04:20:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1600489237; bh=c/5YX7/XsB50Z9xLC1/TiX160ykBQL44OxtocA/8dN8=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=iJUSrOUe42lnT0T9b0YPHQVk2I5vtq4jmeG0gqUcUKC7O4IEGGK2dcCkmbGfNy6NQ AJnTwHY5ebeY0OnuirJAQWfsIEhyQatX9zKucdiXRl0uRmXNDpcGSvVJG3rgn/2klj 6e+f2Ex3pJ3sJ3rc7jpWjdQc+qfPvQGZ4y2HFlzI= Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:20:37 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hch@lst.de, linux-mm@kvack.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, tklauser@distanz.ch, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: [patch 13/15] stackleak: let stack_erasing_sysctl take a kernel pointer buffer Message-ID: <20200919042037.YummvrgIW%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20200918211925.7e97f0ef63d92f5cfe5ccbc5@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org From: Tobias Klauser Subject: stackleak: let stack_erasing_sysctl take a kernel pointer buffer Commit 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler") changed ctl_table.proc_handler to take a kernel pointer. Adjust the signature of stack_erasing_sysctl to match ctl_table.proc_handler which fixes the following sparse warning: kernel/stackleak.c:31:50: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different address spaces) kernel/stackleak.c:31:50: expected void * kernel/stackleak.c:31:50: got void [noderef] __user *buffer Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200907093253.13656-1-tklauser@distanz.ch Fixes: 32927393dc1c ("sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler") Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser Cc: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- include/linux/stackleak.h | 2 +- kernel/stackleak.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/include/linux/stackleak.h~stackleak-let-stack_erasing_sysctl-take-a-kernel-pointer-buffer +++ a/include/linux/stackleak.h @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static inline void stackleak_task_init(s #ifdef CONFIG_STACKLEAK_RUNTIME_DISABLE int stack_erasing_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, - void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos); + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos); #endif #else /* !CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STACKLEAK */ --- a/kernel/stackleak.c~stackleak-let-stack_erasing_sysctl-take-a-kernel-pointer-buffer +++ a/kernel/stackleak.c @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(stack_erasing_bypass); int stack_erasing_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write, - void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) + void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos) { int ret = 0; int state = !static_branch_unlikely(&stack_erasing_bypass); _