From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C576C4361B for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A87224D4 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2020 03:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728152AbgLODOA (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 22:14:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36850 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728095AbgLODNV (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Dec 2020 22:13:21 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 19:12:49 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1608001970; bh=0rW3v+8rHmp6sWNd9Az19b5Cuxhz1yKIMacjd//77Tc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=qgj0RBn2jFgG+sdnu+Ci43jQrXNiomSkw+25Nx18r9yoAisBByntvc2a35ujJj7dK o5j8gNT9jE/Ua69QCG9MhyvcqYIbRSjfKWg0FD28JsOJzndZpwSK3VyXPFKjdaD93E ++ZjGC++Yv7JwoenMzvZpRVJ6tjy9FgYpSbxUWCk= From: Andrew Morton To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mhocko@suse.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, sh_def@163.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: [patch 162/200] mm/oom_kill: change comment and rename is_dump_unreclaim_slabs() Message-ID: <20201215031249.xd7Y7EU-N%akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20201214190237.a17b70ae14f129e2dca3d204@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org From: Hui Su Subject: mm/oom_kill: change comment and rename is_dump_unreclaim_slabs() Change the comment of is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(), it just check whether nr_unreclaimable slabs amount is greater than user memory, and explain why we dump unreclaim slabs. Rename it to should_dump_unreclaim_slab() maybe better. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030182704.GA53949@rlk Signed-off-by: Hui Su Acked-by: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/oom_kill.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/mm/oom_kill.c~mm-oom_kill-change-comment-and-rename-is_dump_unreclaim_slabs +++ a/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -170,11 +170,13 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct t return false; } -/* - * Print out unreclaimble slabs info when unreclaimable slabs amount is greater - * than all user memory (LRU pages) - */ -static bool is_dump_unreclaim_slabs(void) +/** + * Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than + * all user memory(LRU pages). + * dump_unreclaimable_slab() could help in the case that + * oom due to too much unreclaimable slab used by kernel. +*/ +static bool should_dump_unreclaim_slab(void) { unsigned long nr_lru; @@ -463,7 +465,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct oom_contr mem_cgroup_print_oom_meminfo(oc->memcg); else { show_mem(SHOW_MEM_FILTER_NODES, oc->nodemask); - if (is_dump_unreclaim_slabs()) + if (should_dump_unreclaim_slab()) dump_unreclaimable_slab(); } if (sysctl_oom_dump_tasks) _