From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, rdunlap@infradead.org,
rppt@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [patch 06/12] ia64: fix discontig.c section mismatches
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 15:46:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210416224609.QrS02drWb%akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416154523.3f9794326e8e1db549873cf8@linux-foundation.org>
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: ia64: fix discontig.c section mismatches
Fix IA64 discontig.c Section mismatch warnings.
When CONFIG_SPARSEMEM=y and CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG=y, the functions
computer_pernodesize() and scatter_node_data() should not be marked
as __meminit because they are needed after init, on any memory
hotplug event. Also, early_nr_cpus_node() is called by
compute_pernodesize(), so early_nr_cpus_node() cannot be __meminit either.
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1612): Section mismatch in reference from the function arch_alloc_nodedata() to the function .meminit.text:compute_pernodesize()
The function arch_alloc_nodedata() references
the function __meminit compute_pernodesize().
This is often because arch_alloc_nodedata lacks a __meminit
annotation or the annotation of compute_pernodesize is wrong.
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1692): Section mismatch in reference from the function arch_refresh_nodedata() to the function .meminit.text:scatter_node_data()
The function arch_refresh_nodedata() references
the function __meminit scatter_node_data().
This is often because arch_refresh_nodedata lacks a __meminit
annotation or the annotation of scatter_node_data is wrong.
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x1502): Section mismatch in reference from the function compute_pernodesize() to the function .meminit.text:early_nr_cpus_node()
The function compute_pernodesize() references
the function __meminit early_nr_cpus_node().
This is often because compute_pernodesize lacks a __meminit
annotation or the annotation of early_nr_cpus_node is wrong.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210411001201.3069-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c~ia64-fix-discontigc-section-mismatches
+++ a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int __init build_node_maps(unsign
* acpi_boot_init() (which builds the node_to_cpu_mask array) hasn't been
* called yet. Note that node 0 will also count all non-existent cpus.
*/
-static int __meminit early_nr_cpus_node(int node)
+static int early_nr_cpus_node(int node)
{
int cpu, n = 0;
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int __meminit early_nr_cpus_node(
* compute_pernodesize - compute size of pernode data
* @node: the node id.
*/
-static unsigned long __meminit compute_pernodesize(int node)
+static unsigned long compute_pernodesize(int node)
{
unsigned long pernodesize = 0, cpus;
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void __init reserve_pernode_space
}
}
-static void __meminit scatter_node_data(void)
+static void scatter_node_data(void)
{
pg_data_t **dst;
int node;
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-16 22:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-16 22:45 incoming Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:45 ` [patch 01/12] mm: eliminate "expecting prototype" kernel-doc warnings Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:45 ` [patch 02/12] kasan: fix hwasan build for gcc Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 03/12] kasan: remove redundant config option Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 04/12] csky: change a Kconfig symbol name to fix e1000 build error Andrew Morton
2021-04-17 0:45 ` Guo Ren
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 05/12] ia64: remove duplicate entries in generic_defconfig Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 07/12] ia64: tools: remove inclusion of ia64-specific version of errno.h header Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 08/12] ia64: tools: remove duplicate definition of ia64_mf() on ia64 Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 09/12] mm/mapping_dirty_helpers: guard hugepage pud's usage Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 10/12] mm: ptdump: fix build failure Andrew Morton
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 11/12] gcov: clang: fix clang-11+ build Andrew Morton
2021-04-19 21:36 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-19 22:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-04-20 14:12 ` Sasha Levin
2021-04-16 22:46 ` [patch 12/12] lib: remove "expecting prototype" kernel-doc warnings Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210416224609.QrS02drWb%akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).