From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F6CC43460 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 22:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8435F61421 for ; Sat, 8 May 2021 22:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229697AbhEHWot (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 18:44:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52634 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229631AbhEHWos (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 May 2021 18:44:48 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94B6B6100C; Sat, 8 May 2021 22:43:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1620513826; bh=t6U60K2nhK0tCwKQuePVNwE5Y+t1hCHxmrYpR54DTHg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=YQqrFv4oZ5v5Hl7/TrNymsMNPmDmGKcUWz9AFxKiy5QATl979a4oqs4yFW9j2oOA4 xeWa02ICm2NRf3AtTfDFzHLL5XnXyg3DhGN0YKGl+ZY3b8DSPcRnp23pa9f1uXO7pR 1KTaijr/mM39Fo/6h0WcSRr+MHwU9eNJFXW232+0= Date: Sat, 08 May 2021 15:43:46 -0700 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org To: corbet@lwn.net, joe@perches.com, lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de Subject: [merged] maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch removed from -mm tree Message-ID: <20210508224346.d9b-Cy-Ei%akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: s-nail v14.8.16 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org The patch titled Subject: MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management.patch This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree ------------------------------------------------------ From: Lukas Bulwahn Subject: MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT Patch series "kernel-doc and MAINTAINERS clean-up". Roughly 900 warnings of about 21.000 kernel-doc warnings in the kernel tree warn with 'cannot understand function prototype:', i.e., the kernel-doc parser cannot parse the function's signature. The majority, about 600 cases of those, are just struct definitions following the kernel-doc description. Further, spot-check investigations suggest that the authors of the specific kernel-doc descriptions simply were not aware that the general format for a kernel-doc description for a structure requires to prefix the struct name with the keyword 'struct', as in 'struct struct_name - Brief description.'. Details on kernel-doc are at the Link below. Without the struct keyword, kernel-doc does not check if the kernel-doc description fits to the actual struct definition in the source code. Fortunately, in roughly a quarter of these cases, the kernel-doc description is actually complete wrt. its corresponding struct definition. So, the trivial change adding the struct keyword will allow us to keep the kernel-doc descriptions more consistent for future changes, by checking for new kernel-doc warnings. Also, some of the files in ./include/ are not assigned to a specific MAINTAINERS section and hence have no dedicated maintainer. So, if needed, the files in ./include/ are also assigned to the fitting MAINTAINERS section, as I need to identify whom to send the clean-up patch anyway. Here is the change from this kernel-doc janitorial work in the ./include/ directory for MEMORY MANAGEMENT. This patch (of 2): Commit a520110e4a15 ("mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h") adds a new file in ./include/linux, but misses to update MAINTAINERS accordingly. Hence, ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl ./include/linux/pagewalk.h points only to lkml as general fallback for all files, whereas the original ./include/linux/mm.h clearly marks this file part of MEMORY MANAGEMENT. Assign ./include/linux/pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-2-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Joe Perches Cc: Ralf Ramsauer Cc: Jonathan Corbet Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- a/MAINTAINERS~maintainers-assign-pagewalkh-to-memory-management +++ a/MAINTAINERS @@ -11744,6 +11744,7 @@ F: include/linux/gfp.h F: include/linux/memory_hotplug.h F: include/linux/mm.h F: include/linux/mmzone.h +F: include/linux/pagewalk.h F: include/linux/vmalloc.h F: mm/ _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com are