From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m12-15.163.com (m12-15.163.com [220.181.12.15]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76B9173 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:50:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-Id; bh=bMErQq/RHb9+Nv55IT 915+/t6jItHEXB1wfDPx5DuKk=; b=RbV5RU0tnWstvdhOPEM4K8FGRMLRSRE2D8 sekEcSH5jIjvU9FV7aeYNnepLTizxTVUn+J+2W7CPoJQUbWY23RT3YNLgY64V/43 fy2VGhMS8g+7vBqQvwDULgGcVx8p9eDMHefFTIH+KIppVyav5Tacos+ysOBbirL3 oO4lj6D+k= Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [36.111.140.26]) by smtp11 (Coremail) with SMTP id D8CowAB33vY718lgxTs1AA--.106S3; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:50:32 +0800 (CST) From: wujianguo106@163.com To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev Cc: pabeni@redhat.com, fw@strlen.de Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] mptcp: fix warning in __skb_flow_dissect() when do syn cookie for subflow join Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:49:27 +0800 Message-Id: <1623840570-42004-2-git-send-email-wujianguo106@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1623840570-42004-1-git-send-email-wujianguo106@163.com> References: <1623840570-42004-1-git-send-email-wujianguo106@163.com> X-CM-TRANSID:D8CowAB33vY718lgxTs1AA--.106S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoWxAw4DCrWfZFy3AFy7Gr17KFg_yoWrAr13pr 45GrWDGrW8Jwn8Jr4YyFW7Xrn8Kr4qvFW8Gw1ayr1kJFs8Gwn2qFy8Jr40vFy7GrWYg347 Kr1DJ3WkKFn7ZaUanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jVOJ5UUUUU= X-Originating-IP: [36.111.140.26] X-CM-SenderInfo: 5zxmxt5qjx0iiqw6il2tof0z/xtbB+AmzkF2MZRlTUQAAs9 X-Mailing-List: mptcp@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Jianguo Wu I got the following warning message while doing the test: [ 55.552626] TCP: request_sock_subflow: Possible SYN flooding on port 8099. Sending cookies. Check SNMP counters. [ 55.553024] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 55.553027] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 10 at net/core/flow_dissector.c:984 __skb_flow_dissect+0x280/0x1650 ... [ 55.553117] CPU: 0 PID: 10 Comm: ksoftirqd/0 Not tainted 5.12.0+ #18 [ 55.553121] Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 [ 55.553124] RIP: 0010:__skb_flow_dissect+0x280/0x1650 ... [ 55.553133] RSP: 0018:ffffb79580087770 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 55.553137] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffff8ddb58e0 RCX: ffffb79580087888 [ 55.553139] RDX: ffffffff8ddb58e0 RSI: ffff8f7e4652b600 RDI: 0000000000000000 [ 55.553141] RBP: ffffb79580087858 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000008 [ 55.553143] R10: 000000008c622965 R11: 00000000d3313a5b R12: ffff8f7e4652b600 [ 55.553146] R13: ffff8f7e465c9062 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffb79580087888 [ 55.553149] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f7f75e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 55.553152] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 55.553154] CR2: 00007f73d1d19000 CR3: 0000000135e10004 CR4: 00000000003706f0 [ 55.553160] Call Trace: [ 55.553166] ? __sha256_final+0x67/0xd0 [ 55.553173] ? sha256+0x7e/0xa0 [ 55.553177] __skb_get_hash+0x57/0x210 [ 55.553182] subflow_init_req_cookie_join_save+0xac/0xc0 [ 55.553189] subflow_check_req+0x474/0x550 [ 55.553195] ? ip_route_output_key_hash+0x67/0x90 [ 55.553200] ? xfrm_lookup_route+0x1d/0xa0 [ 55.553207] subflow_v4_route_req+0x8e/0xd0 [ 55.553212] tcp_conn_request+0x31e/0xab0 [ 55.553218] ? selinux_socket_sock_rcv_skb+0x116/0x210 [ 55.553224] ? tcp_rcv_state_process+0x179/0x6d0 [ 55.553229] tcp_rcv_state_process+0x179/0x6d0 [ 55.553235] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0xaf/0x220 [ 55.553239] tcp_v4_rcv+0xce4/0xd80 [ 55.553243] ? ip_route_input_rcu+0x246/0x260 [ 55.553248] ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x35/0x1b0 [ 55.553253] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x44/0x50 [ 55.553258] ip_local_deliver+0x6c/0x110 [ 55.553262] ? ip_rcv_finish_core.isra.19+0x5a/0x400 [ 55.553267] ip_rcv+0xd1/0xe0 ... After debugging, I found in __skb_flow_dissect(), skb->dev and skb->sk are both NULL, then net is NULL, and trigger WARN_ON_ONCE(!net), actually net is always NULL in this code path, as skb->dev is set to NULL in tcp_v4_rcv(), and skb->sk is never set. Code snippet in __skb_flow_dissect() that trigger warning: 975 if (skb) { 976 if (!net) { 977 if (skb->dev) 978 net = dev_net(skb->dev); 979 else if (skb->sk) 980 net = sock_net(skb->sk); 981 } 982 } 983 984 WARN_ON_ONCE(!net); So, using seq and transport header derived hash. Fixes: 9466a1ccebbe("mptcp: enable JOIN requests even if cookies are in use"). Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni Suggested-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu --- net/mptcp/syncookies.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/mptcp/syncookies.c b/net/mptcp/syncookies.c index abe0fd099746..37127781aee9 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/syncookies.c +++ b/net/mptcp/syncookies.c @@ -37,7 +37,21 @@ struct join_entry { static u32 mptcp_join_entry_hash(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net *net) { - u32 i = skb_get_hash(skb) ^ net_hash_mix(net); + static u32 mptcp_join_hash_secret __read_mostly; + struct tcphdr *th = tcp_hdr(skb); + u32 seq, i; + + net_get_random_once(&mptcp_join_hash_secret, + sizeof(mptcp_join_hash_secret)); + + if (th->syn) + seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq; + else + seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq - 1; + + i = jhash_3words(seq, net_hash_mix(net), + (__force __u32)th->source << 16 | (__force __u32)th->dest, + mptcp_join_hash_secret); return i % ARRAY_SIZE(join_entries); } -- 1.8.3.1