mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	matthieu.baerts@tessares.net, fw@strlen.de,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 6/6] mptcp: properly account bulk freed memory
Date: Fri,  9 Jul 2021 17:20:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210710002051.216010-7-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210710002051.216010-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

After commit 879526030c8b ("mptcp: protect the rx path with
the msk socket spinlock") the rmem currently used by a given
msk is really sk_rmem_alloc - rmem_released.

The safety check in mptcp_data_ready() does not take the above
in due account, as a result legit incoming data is kept in
subflow receive queue with no reason, delaying or blocking
MPTCP-level ack generation.

This change addresses the issue introducing a new helper to fetch
the rmem memory and using it as needed. Additionally add a MIB
counter for the exceptional event described above - the peer is
misbehaving.

Finally, introduce the required annotation when rmem_released is
updated.

Fixes: 879526030c8b ("mptcp: protect the rx path with the msk socket spinlock")
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/211
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/mib.c      |  1 +
 net/mptcp/mib.h      |  1 +
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 12 +++++++-----
 net/mptcp/protocol.h | 10 +++++++++-
 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.c b/net/mptcp/mib.c
index 52ea2517e856..ff2cc0e3273d 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.c
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static const struct snmp_mib mptcp_snmp_list[] = {
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RmSubflow", MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPPrioTx", MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIOTX),
 	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("MPPrioRx", MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIORX),
+	SNMP_MIB_ITEM("RcvPruned", MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED),
 	SNMP_MIB_SENTINEL
 };
 
diff --git a/net/mptcp/mib.h b/net/mptcp/mib.h
index 193466c9b549..0663cb12b448 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/mib.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/mib.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ enum linux_mptcp_mib_field {
 	MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW,		/* Remove a subflow */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIOTX,		/* Transmit a MP_PRIO */
 	MPTCP_MIB_MPPRIORX,		/* Received a MP_PRIO */
+	MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED,		/* Incoming packet dropped due to memory limit */
 	__MPTCP_MIB_MAX
 };
 
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 7a5afa8c6866..a88924947815 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ static void mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	bool cleanup, rx_empty;
 
 	cleanup = (space > 0) && (space >= (old_space << 1));
-	rx_empty = !atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
+	rx_empty = !__mptcp_rmem(sk);
 
 	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
 		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
@@ -720,8 +720,10 @@ void mptcp_data_ready(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 		sk_rbuf = ssk_rbuf;
 
 	/* over limit? can't append more skbs to msk, Also, no need to wake-up*/
-	if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) > sk_rbuf)
+	if (__mptcp_rmem(sk) > sk_rbuf) {
+		MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RCVPRUNED);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/* Wake-up the reader only for in-sequence data */
 	mptcp_data_lock(sk);
@@ -1754,7 +1756,7 @@ static int __mptcp_recvmsg_mskq(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 		if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
 			/* we will bulk release the skb memory later */
 			skb->destructor = NULL;
-			msk->rmem_released += skb->truesize;
+			WRITE_ONCE(msk->rmem_released, msk->rmem_released + skb->truesize);
 			__skb_unlink(skb, &msk->receive_queue);
 			__kfree_skb(skb);
 		}
@@ -1873,7 +1875,7 @@ static void __mptcp_update_rmem(struct sock *sk)
 
 	atomic_sub(msk->rmem_released, &sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
 	sk_mem_uncharge(sk, msk->rmem_released);
-	msk->rmem_released = 0;
+	WRITE_ONCE(msk->rmem_released, 0);
 }
 
 static void __mptcp_splice_receive_queue(struct sock *sk)
@@ -2380,7 +2382,7 @@ static int __mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	msk->out_of_order_queue = RB_ROOT;
 	msk->first_pending = NULL;
 	msk->wmem_reserved = 0;
-	msk->rmem_released = 0;
+	WRITE_ONCE(msk->rmem_released, 0);
 	msk->tx_pending_data = 0;
 
 	msk->first = NULL;
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 426ed80fe72f..0f0c026c5f8b 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -296,9 +296,17 @@ static inline struct mptcp_sock *mptcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
 	return (struct mptcp_sock *)sk;
 }
 
+/* the msk socket don't use the backlog, also account for the bulk
+ * free memory
+ */
+static inline int __mptcp_rmem(const struct sock *sk)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) - READ_ONCE(mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_released);
+}
+
 static inline int __mptcp_space(const struct sock *sk)
 {
-	return tcp_space(sk) + READ_ONCE(mptcp_sk(sk)->rmem_released);
+	return tcp_win_from_space(sk, READ_ONCE(sk->sk_rcvbuf) - __mptcp_rmem(sk));
 }
 
 static inline struct mptcp_data_frag *mptcp_send_head(const struct sock *sk)
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-10  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-10  0:20 [PATCH net 0/6] mptcp: Connection and accounting fixes Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` [PATCH net 1/6] mptcp: fix warning in __skb_flow_dissect() when do syn cookie for subflow join Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` [PATCH net 2/6] mptcp: remove redundant req destruct in subflow_check_req() Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` [PATCH net 3/6] mptcp: fix syncookie process if mptcp can not_accept new subflow Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` [PATCH net 4/6] mptcp: avoid processing packet if a subflow reset Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` [PATCH net 5/6] selftests: mptcp: fix case multiple subflows limited by server Mat Martineau
2021-07-10  0:20 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-07-10  1:50 ` [PATCH net 0/6] mptcp: Connection and accounting fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210710002051.216010-7-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH net 6/6] mptcp: properly account bulk freed memory' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox