mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
	matthieu.baerts@tessares.net, mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
	geliangtang@gmail.com,
	Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] mptcp: fix memory leak on address flush
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 16:42:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210818234237.242266-2-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818234237.242266-1-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>

From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

The endpoint cleanup path is prone to a memory leak, as reported
by syzkaller:

 BUG: memory leak
 unreferenced object 0xffff88810680ea00 (size 64):
   comm "syz-executor.6", pid 6191, jiffies 4295756280 (age 24.138s)
   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
     58 75 7d 3c 80 88 ff ff 22 01 00 00 00 00 ad de  Xu}<....".......
     01 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 ac 1e 00 07 00 00 00 00  ................
   backtrace:
     [<0000000072a9f72a>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:591 [inline]
     [<0000000072a9f72a>] mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x287/0x9f0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170
     [<00000000f6e931bf>] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x225/0x340 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731
     [<00000000f1504a2c>] genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline]
     [<00000000f1504a2c>] genl_rcv_msg+0x341/0x5b0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792
     [<0000000097e76f6a>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x148/0x430 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504
     [<00000000ceefa2b8>] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803
     [<000000008ff91aec>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline]
     [<000000008ff91aec>] netlink_unicast+0x537/0x750 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340
     [<0000000041682c35>] netlink_sendmsg+0x846/0xd80 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929
     [<00000000df3aa8e7>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline]
     [<00000000df3aa8e7>] sock_sendmsg+0x14e/0x190 net/socket.c:724
     [<000000002154c54c>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x709/0x870 net/socket.c:2403
     [<000000001aab01d7>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xff/0x170 net/socket.c:2457
     [<00000000fa3b1446>] __sys_sendmsg+0xe5/0x1b0 net/socket.c:2486
     [<00000000db2ee9c7>] do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
     [<00000000db2ee9c7>] do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
     [<000000005873517d>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

We should not require an allocation to cleanup stuff.

Rework the code a bit so that the additional RCU work is no more needed.

Fixes: 1729cf186d8a ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port")
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 44 ++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 56263c2c4014..7b3794459783 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -1135,36 +1135,12 @@ static int mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr(struct net *net,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-struct addr_entry_release_work {
-	struct rcu_work	rwork;
-	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry;
-};
-
-static void mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(struct work_struct *work)
+/* caller must ensure the RCU grace period is already elapsed */
+static void __mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
 {
-	struct addr_entry_release_work *w;
-	struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry;
-
-	w = container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct addr_entry_release_work, rwork);
-	entry = w->entry;
-	if (entry) {
-		if (entry->lsk)
-			sock_release(entry->lsk);
-		kfree(entry);
-	}
-	kfree(w);
-}
-
-static void mptcp_pm_free_addr_entry(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
-{
-	struct addr_entry_release_work *w;
-
-	w = kmalloc(sizeof(*w), GFP_ATOMIC);
-	if (w) {
-		INIT_RCU_WORK(&w->rwork, mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry);
-		w->entry = entry;
-		queue_rcu_work(system_wq, &w->rwork);
-	}
+	if (entry->lsk)
+		sock_release(entry->lsk);
+	kfree(entry);
 }
 
 static int mptcp_nl_remove_id_zero_address(struct net *net,
@@ -1244,7 +1220,8 @@ static int mptcp_nl_cmd_del_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pernet->lock);
 
 	mptcp_nl_remove_subflow_and_signal_addr(sock_net(skb->sk), &entry->addr);
-	mptcp_pm_free_addr_entry(entry);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+	__mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(entry);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1297,6 +1274,7 @@ static void mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list(struct net *net,
 	}
 }
 
+/* caller must ensure the RCU grace period is already elapsed */
 static void __flush_addrs(struct list_head *list)
 {
 	while (!list_empty(list)) {
@@ -1305,7 +1283,7 @@ static void __flush_addrs(struct list_head *list)
 		cur = list_entry(list->next,
 				 struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry, list);
 		list_del_rcu(&cur->list);
-		mptcp_pm_free_addr_entry(cur);
+		__mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(cur);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1329,6 +1307,7 @@ static int mptcp_nl_cmd_flush_addrs(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
 	bitmap_zero(pernet->id_bitmap, MAX_ADDR_ID + 1);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&pernet->lock);
 	mptcp_nl_remove_addrs_list(sock_net(skb->sk), &free_list);
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	__flush_addrs(&free_list);
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1939,7 +1918,8 @@ static void __net_exit pm_nl_exit_net(struct list_head *net_list)
 		struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet = net_generic(net, pm_nl_pernet_id);
 
 		/* net is removed from namespace list, can't race with
-		 * other modifiers
+		 * other modifiers, also netns core already waited for a
+		 * RCU grace period.
 		 */
 		__flush_addrs(&pernet->local_addr_list);
 	}
-- 
2.33.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-18 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18 23:42 [PATCH net 0/2] mptcp: Bug fixes Mat Martineau
2021-08-18 23:42 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-08-18 23:42 ` [PATCH net 2/2] mptcp: full fully established support after ADD_ADDR Mat Martineau
2021-08-19 11:30 ` [PATCH net 0/2] mptcp: Bug fixes patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210818234237.242266-2-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).