From: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 15:51:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2918bab3-73c7-6dc2-f84f-f27a8e4a9cd5@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+WQbwuD5NT4Rz1NVm6Yr75MrJ=oCrTOV2N-e-_dy2YEcPZyYQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 2021/6/21 15:42, Geliang Tang wrote:
>> + }
>> + len = mptcp_add_addr_len(local.family, false, !!local.port);
>> + if (remaining < len)
>> + return false;
>> + *size += len;
>> + opts->addr = local;
> Could we rename this struct member addr in struct mptcp_out_options to
> local?
>
>> opts->ahmac = add_addr_generate_hmac(msk->local_key,
>> msk->remote_key,
>> &opts->addr);
>> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_ADD_ADDR;
>> + flags = (u8)~BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL);
>> + pr_debug("addr_id=%d, ahmac=%llu, echo=0, port=%d, addr_signal:%x",
>> + opts->addr.id, opts->ahmac, ntohs(opts->addr.port), add_addr);
> Could we merge these two debug logs into one and move it at the the end
> of this function, before 'return true'?
>
> -Geliang
>
Thanks for your review.
I will change them in v5 as your advice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-21 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 8:18 [PATCH v4 0/4] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Yonglong Li
2021-06-18 11:20 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 3:51 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 6:42 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:15 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 7:39 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:49 ` Yonglong Li
2021-06-21 8:06 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:42 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-21 7:51 ` Yonglong Li [this message]
2021-06-21 8:29 ` Geliang Tang
2021-06-18 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Yonglong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2918bab3-73c7-6dc2-f84f-f27a8e4a9cd5@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).