mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	kbuild@lists.01.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: lkp@intel.com, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 5/8] mptcp: faster active backup recovery
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 12:15:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4daa4dc7-c30f-8125-9fdb-7e7376f05029@tessares.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202107141117.6wB0621n-lkp@intel.com>

Hi Dan,

On 14/07/2021 10:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Paolo-Abeni/mptcp-refactor-active-backup/20210714-051541
> base:   https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next.git export
> config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210713 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-22) 9.3.0
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> New smatch warnings:
> net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:931 mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale() error: uninitialized symbol 'push'.


Thank you for your email!



It looks like Intel's kernel test robot spot the same issue a few hours
ago [1] (that's good, it was very quick!).

Paolo already sent a fix [2].


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/202107140830.4kwYyqkO-lkp@intel.com/
[2]
https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/1d91265cca09bb69516907f44b5e4b72c4efabe1.1626252886.git.pabeni@redhat.com/T/#u


Cheers,

Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-13 21:13 [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 0/8] mptcp: refactor active backup Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: more accurate timeout Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 2/8] mptcp: less aggressive retransmission stragegy Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 3/8] mptcp: handle pending data on closed subflow Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 4/8] mptcp: cleanup sysctl data and helpers Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 5/8] mptcp: faster active backup recovery Paolo Abeni
2021-07-14  0:46   ` kernel test robot
2021-07-14  8:36   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-07-14 10:15     ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 6/8] mptcp: add mibs for stale subflows processing Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 7/8] mptcp: backup flag from incoming MPJ ack option Paolo Abeni
2021-07-13 21:13 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 8/8] selftests: mptcp: add testcase for active-back Paolo Abeni
2021-07-15  1:20 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 0/8] mptcp: refactor active backup Mat Martineau
2021-07-16 10:01 ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4daa4dc7-c30f-8125-9fdb-7e7376f05029@tessares.net \
    --to=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=kbuild@lists.01.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 5/8] mptcp: faster active backup recovery' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox