mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] mptcp: Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 14:09:43 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4fee0cc-6928-2ae6-fa1d-134f5787cbe@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82474768-2c86-b2b7-afeb-30618b2ce094@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, Mat Martineau wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>
>> The TCP option parser in mptcp (mptcp_get_options) could read one byte
>> out of bounds. When the length is 1, the execution flow gets into the
>> loop, reads one byte of the opcode, and if the opcode is neither
>> TCPOPT_EOL nor TCPOPT_NOP, it reads one more byte, which exceeds the
>> length of 1.
>> 
>> This fix is inspired by commit 9609dad263f8 ("ipv4: tcp_input: fix stack
>> out of bounds when parsing TCP options.").
>> 
>> Cc: Young Xiao <92siuyang@gmail.com>
>> Fixes: cec37a6e41aa ("mptcp: Handle MP_CAPABLE options for outgoing 
>> connections")
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> net/mptcp/options.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> index 6b825fb3fa83..9b263f27ce9b 100644
>> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
>> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
>> @@ -356,6 +356,8 @@ void mptcp_get_options(const struct sk_buff *skb,
>> 			length--;
>> 			continue;
>> 		default:
>> +			if (length < 2)
>> +				return;
>> 			opsize = *ptr++;
>> 			if (opsize < 2) /* "silly options" */
>> 				return;
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>
> Matthieu -
>
> Could you apply this in mptcp_net-next so it's easier to track when the patch 
> finds its way to net-next?
>
> (MPTCP patchwork status set to "queued")

And to clarify for Maxim: we have a separate MPTCP git tree where we stage 
MPTCP changes before submitting to net- or net-next. For your patch set 
that has related changes across a few networking subsystems, sending 
directly to netdev is the best thing to do.

We do have other queued changes for netdev so I think it would work well 
to include this patch in our tree now, and it will automatically disappear 
once it is fully merged upstream. Sometimes it takes a couple of weeks for 
the net/master branch to get merged in to net-next/master.

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-10 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-10 16:40 [PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] netfilter: synproxy: " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 16:43   ` Florian Westphal
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] mptcp: " Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 21:03   ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-10 21:09     ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-06-11 14:30     ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-06-10 16:40 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] sch_cake: Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options and header Maxim Mikityanskiy
2021-06-10 21:50 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] Fix out of bounds when parsing TCP options patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4fee0cc-6928-2ae6-fa1d-134f5787cbe@linux.intel.com \
    --to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthieu.baerts@tessares.net \
    --cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).