From: Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 3/7] reuse tcp_sendmsg_fastopen()
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 06:20:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <809542cd-6f1b-fe2e-e3e3-f667bcd02a90@shytyi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bebaee5b0a6b183603d8c8428a01750b41df515.camel@redhat.com>
On 9/20/2022 4:36 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 14:52 +0200, Dmytro Shytyi wrote:
>> In the following patches we will reuse modified tcp_sendmsg_fastopen().
>> We call it from mptcp_sendmsg().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shytyi <dmytro@shytyi.net>
>> ---
>> include/net/tcp.h | 3 +++
>> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 11 +++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
>> index 735e957f7f4b..a7d49e42470a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/tcp.h
>> +++ b/include/net/tcp.h
>> @@ -1754,6 +1754,9 @@ struct sock *tcp_try_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> struct request_sock *req,
>> struct tcp_fastopen_cookie *foc,
>> const struct dst_entry *dst);
>> +int tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> + int *copied, size_t size,
>> + struct ubuf_info *uarg);
>> void tcp_fastopen_init_key_once(struct net *net);
>> bool tcp_fastopen_cookie_check(struct sock *sk, u16 *mss,
>> struct tcp_fastopen_cookie *cookie);
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
>> index 9251c99d3cfd..d10a3cdae220 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
>> @@ -280,6 +280,9 @@
>> #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>> #include <net/busy_poll.h>
>>
>> +#include <net/mptcp.h>
>> +#include "../mptcp/protocol.h"
>> +
>> /* Track pending CMSGs. */
>> enum {
>> TCP_CMSG_INQ = 1,
>> @@ -1162,9 +1165,9 @@ void tcp_free_fastopen_req(struct tcp_sock *tp)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static int tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> - int *copied, size_t size,
>> - struct ubuf_info *uarg)
>> +int tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> + int *copied, size_t size,
>> + struct ubuf_info *uarg)
>> {
>> struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
>> struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
>> @@ -1197,8 +1200,13 @@ static int tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
>> }
>> }
>> flags = (msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT) ? O_NONBLOCK : 0;
>> - err = __inet_stream_connect(sk->sk_socket, uaddr,
>> - msg->msg_namelen, flags, 1);
>> + if (!sk_is_mptcp(sk))
>> + err = __inet_stream_connect(sk->sk_socket, uaddr,
>> + msg->msg_namelen, flags, 1);
>> + else
>> + err = mptcp_stream_connect(sk->sk_socket, uaddr,
>> + msg->msg_namelen, msg->msg_flags);
>
> I guess the goal of the above change is let mptcp_stream_connect()
> update the msk socket status, is that correct?
>
> However there are a few problems with lock: you must acquite the
> subflow socket lock before calling tcp_sendmsg_fastopen() - or will see
> subflow state corruption - but that in turn will cause a deadlock as
> mptcp_stream_connect() acquires the msk socket lock and then the
> subflow socket lock.
>
> I think it's better leave the tcp_sendmsg_fastopen() body unchanged...
In v9 I still modify the tcp_sendmsg_fastopen() a little bit with adding
some locks.
>> +
>> /* fastopen_req could already be freed in __inet_stream_connect
>> * if the connection times out or gets rst
>> */
>> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>> index 470045793181..8cf307e4e59c 100644
>> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
>> @@ -1673,9 +1673,16 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
>> long timeo;
>>
>> /* we don't support FASTOPEN yet */
>> - if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_FASTOPEN)
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + if (msg->msg_flags & MSG_FASTOPEN) {
>> + struct socket *ssock = __mptcp_nmpc_socket(msk);
> ... acquire the subflow socket lock here...
Some locks are acquired in v9.
>>
>> + if (ssock) {
>> + int copied_syn_fastopen = 0;
>> +
>> + ret = tcp_sendmsg_fastopen(ssock->sk, msg, &copied_syn_fastopen, len, NULL);
>> + copied += copied_syn_fastopen;
>> + }
> ... and additionally handle the sock state update here. Possibly you
> can encapsulate all the fastopen code in a new function - say
> __mptcp_sendmsg_fastopen(), as it will be called under the msk socket
> lock.
>
>
> Side note: you should enter the fastopen branch even when
> inet_sk(ssock->sk)->defer_connect is set
I tried to add this (defer_connect) in v9, but didn't check if it works.
> Cheers,
>
> Paolo
Best,
Dmytro.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-20 12:52 [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 0/7] mptcp: Fast Open Mechanism Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 1/7] add mptcp_stream_connect to protocol.h Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 2/7] add mptcp_setsockopt_fastopen Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 3/7] reuse tcp_sendmsg_fastopen() Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 14:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-20 15:02 ` Matthieu Baerts
2022-09-20 15:10 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 15:12 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-21 4:20 ` Dmytro Shytyi [this message]
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 4/7] mptfo variables for msk, options. Fix loop retrans Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 14:56 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-21 4:15 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 5/7] Fix unxpctd val of subflow->map_seq(dscrd packet) Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 16:04 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-21 4:12 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 6/7] add skb to mskq in tcp_fastopen_add_skb() Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 16:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-21 4:09 ` Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 12:52 ` [RFC PATCH mptcp-next v8 7/7] selftests: mptfo initiator/listener Dmytro Shytyi
2022-09-20 13:17 ` selftests: mptfo initiator/listener: Build Failure MPTCP CI
2022-09-20 14:40 ` selftests: mptfo initiator/listener: Tests Results MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=809542cd-6f1b-fe2e-e3e3-f667bcd02a90@shytyi.net \
--to=dmytro@shytyi.net \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).