From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
To: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo106@163.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-net v8 4/5] mptcp: avoid processing packet if a subflow reset
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:35:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+WQbwuJ64zQcCnOAwqw9_Mxud6BRJu300sP4pWFOeU7FH8nEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624698998-9029-5-git-send-email-wujianguo106@163.com>
Hi Jianguo,
Thank you for this new patch set!
There are three checkpatch.pl warnings in this patch set, please fix them.
And a minor comment below.
---------------------------------------------------------------
0001-mptcp-fix-warning-in-__skb_flow_dissect-when-do-syn-.patch
---------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#7:
I did stress test with wrk(https://github.com/wg/wrk) and
webfsd(https://github.com/ourway/webfsd)
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 22 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
0001-mptcp-fix-warning-in-__skb_flow_dissect-when-do-syn-.patch has
style problems, please review.
---------------------------------------------------------------
0002-mptcp-remove-redundant-req-destruct-in-subflow_check.patch
---------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#14:
tcp_v4_reqsk_destructor() twice, and may double free inet_rsk(req)->ireq_opt.
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 11 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
0002-mptcp-remove-redundant-req-destruct-in-subflow_check.patch has
style problems, please review.
---------------------------------------------------------------
0005-selftests-mptcp-fix-case-multiple-subflows-limited-b.patch
---------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75
chars per line)
#7:
After patch "mptcp: fix syncookie process if mptcp can not_accept new subflow",
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked
NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.
0005-selftests-mptcp-fix-case-multiple-subflows-limited-b.patch has
style problems, please review.
NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
<wujianguo106@163.com> 于2021年6月26日周六 下午5:17写道:
>
> From: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
>
> If check_fully_established() causes a subflow reset, it should not
> continue to process the packet in tcp_data_queue().
> Add a return value to mptcp_incoming_options(), and return false if a
> subflow has been reset, else return true. Then drop the packet in
> tcp_data_queue()/tcp_rcv_state_process() if mptcp_incoming_options()
> return false.
>
> Fixes: d582484726c4 ("mptcp: fix fallback for MP_JOIN subflows")
> Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu <wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
> include/net/mptcp.h | 5 +++--
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
> net/mptcp/options.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index cb580b0..8b5af68 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool mptcp_synack_options(const struct request_sock *req, unsigned int *size,
> bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int *size, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_out_options *opts);
> -void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
> +bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
>
> void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
> struct mptcp_out_options *opts);
> @@ -227,9 +227,10 @@ static inline bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk,
> return false;
> }
>
> -static inline void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk,
> +static inline bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> + return true;
> }
>
> static inline void mptcp_skb_ext_move(struct sk_buff *to,
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 7d5e59f..4bacd7d 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -4247,6 +4247,9 @@ void tcp_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> trace_tcp_receive_reset(sk);
>
> + /* mptcp can't tell us to ignore reset pkts,
> + * so just ignore the return value of mptcp_incoming_options().
> + */
> if (sk_is_mptcp(sk))
> mptcp_incoming_options(sk, skb);
>
> @@ -4941,8 +4944,13 @@ static void tcp_data_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> bool fragstolen;
> int eaten;
>
> - if (sk_is_mptcp(sk))
> - mptcp_incoming_options(sk, skb);
> + /* If a subflow has been reset, the packet should not continue
> + * to be processed, drop the packet.
> + */
> + if (sk_is_mptcp(sk) && !mptcp_incoming_options(sk, skb)) {
> + __kfree_skb(skb);
> + return;
> + }
>
> if (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq) {
> __kfree_skb(skb);
> @@ -6523,8 +6531,11 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> case TCP_CLOSING:
> case TCP_LAST_ACK:
> if (!before(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq, tp->rcv_nxt)) {
> - if (sk_is_mptcp(sk))
> - mptcp_incoming_options(sk, skb);
> + /* If a subflow has been reset, the packet should not
> + * continue to be processed, drop the packet.
> + */
> + if (sk_is_mptcp(sk) && !mptcp_incoming_options(sk, skb))
> + goto discard;
> break;
> }
> fallthrough;
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index b5850af..4452455 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -1035,7 +1035,8 @@ static bool add_addr_hmac_valid(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> return hmac == mp_opt->ahmac;
> }
>
> -void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +/* Return false if a subflow has been reset, else return true */
> +bool mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
> struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(subflow->conn);
> @@ -1053,12 +1054,16 @@ void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> __mptcp_check_push(subflow->conn, sk);
> __mptcp_data_acked(subflow->conn);
> mptcp_data_unlock(subflow->conn);
> - return;
> + return true;
> }
>
> mptcp_get_options(sk, skb, &mp_opt);
> +
> + /* The subflow can be in close state only if check_fully_established()
> + * just sent a reset. If so, tell the caller to ignore the current packet.
> + */
> if (!check_fully_established(msk, sk, subflow, skb, &mp_opt))
> - return;
> + return sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE;
>
> if (mp_opt.fastclose &&
> msk->local_key == mp_opt.rcvr_key) {
> @@ -1100,7 +1105,7 @@ void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
>
> if (!mp_opt.dss)
> - return;
> + return true;
>
> /* we can't wait for recvmsg() to update the ack_seq, otherwise
> * monodirectional flows will stuck
> @@ -1119,12 +1124,12 @@ void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> schedule_work(&msk->work))
> sock_hold(subflow->conn);
>
> - return;
> + return true;
> }
>
> mpext = skb_ext_add(skb, SKB_EXT_MPTCP);
> if (!mpext)
> - return;
> + return true;
>
> memset(mpext, 0, sizeof(*mpext));
>
> @@ -1153,6 +1158,8 @@ void mptcp_incoming_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (mpext->csum_reqd)
> mpext->csum = mp_opt.csum;
> }
> +
How about adding a label 'out:' here, and all above 'return true' can use
'goto out' instead. This is more like the kernel code style. WDYT?
-Geliang
> + return true;
> }
>
> static void mptcp_set_rwin(const struct tcp_sock *tp)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-26 9:16 [PATCH mptcp-net v8 0/5] Fix some mptcp syncookie process bugs wujianguo106
2021-06-26 9:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v8 1/5] mptcp: fix warning in __skb_flow_dissect() when do syn cookie for subflow join wujianguo106
2021-06-26 9:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v8 2/5] mptcp: remove redundant req destruct in subflow_check_req() wujianguo106
2021-06-26 9:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v8 3/5] mptcp: fix syncookie process if mptcp can not_accept new subflow wujianguo106
2021-06-26 9:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v8 4/5] mptcp: avoid processing packet if a subflow reset wujianguo106
2021-06-28 8:35 ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2021-06-28 16:45 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-06-29 2:54 ` Jianguo Wu
2021-06-29 2:55 ` Jianguo Wu
2021-06-26 9:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-net v8 5/5] selftests: mptcp: fix case multiple subflows limited by server wujianguo106
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+WQbwuJ64zQcCnOAwqw9_Mxud6BRJu300sP4pWFOeU7FH8nEA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=wujianguo106@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).