mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
To: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 0/6] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:02:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+WQbwv2RESX8MYjV1BugDHMDxVOMUKDu3xyOX9ho8+MQzHdAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c340a979-1e87-b4c5-0955-b10890144fbe@chinatelecom.cn>

Ok, thanks.

Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn> 于2021年7月19日周一 下午5:57写道:
>
> Hi Geliang,
>
> I tested v9 and don't get any issue last weekend and today.
> I think v9 is ok.
>
> On 2021/7/16 18:13, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > Thanks, Yonglong,
> >
> > I'll do more tests for v9. And please test v9 on your computer too.
> >
> > Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn> 于2021年7月16日周五 下午5:36写道:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Geliang,
> >>
> >> The v9 LGTM. Thank you for your help and efforts.
> >>
> >> On 2021/7/16 11:04, Geliang Tang wrote:
> >>> From: Yonglong Li <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>
> >>>
> >>> fix issue: ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR use pm.add_signal to mark event, so
> >>> in some case pm.add_signal will be flush when ADD_ADDR/RM_ADDR in
> >>> process.
> >>>
> >>> fix issue: if ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo process at the same time,
> >>> only one event can write pm.add_signal. so ADD_ADDR will process
> >>> after add_timer timeout or ADD_ADDR-echo will not be process.
> >>>
> >>> Patch 1 fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe clear addr_signal each other.
> >>>
> >>> Patch 2 and 3 deal ADD_ADDR and ADD_ADDR-echo with separately to fix
> >>> conflicts in using pm.addr_signal porcess.
> >>>
> >>> Patch 4 MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT is not necessary.
> >>>
> >>> v1->v2:
> >>>  - remove READ_ONCE under the pm spin lock.
> >>>
> >>> v2->v3:
> >>>  - Patch 2: mptcp_pm_should_add_addr => mptcp_pm_should_add_signal_addr
> >>>  - Patch 3: avoid read-modify-write of msk->pm.addr_signal and change
> >>>    mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal to return void.
> >>>
> >>> v3->v4:
> >>>  - Patch 1: use ~(BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL) | BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO))
> >>>    instead of BIT(MPTCP_RM_ADDR_SIGNAL)
> >>>  - Patch 3: simple the code; init flags; fix wrong goto logic code;
> >>>
> >>> v4->v5:
> >>>  - Patch 3: simple the code of 'mptcp_established_options_add_addr'
> >>>
> >>> v5->v6:
> >>>  - Patch2: fix fails of 'mptcp_join.sh -t'. In mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack
> >>>    without MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL check so pure ack can not be sent for
> >>>    ADD_ADDR. That cause ADD_ADDR can not be sent in time.
> >>>  - Patch3: refactor some code according Geliang's suggestions.
> >>>  - Patch4: modify commit comment
> >>>
> >>> v6->v7:
> >>>  - Patch1: use reverse xmas tree order for variables definition
> >>>  - Patch3: refactor some code according Geliang's suggestions.
> >>>  - add a Patch4: remove some double-check
> >>>
> >>> v7->v8:
> >>>  - Patch1,2: exchange patch1 and patch2
> >>>  - Patch3: refactor some code according Geliang's suggestions.
> >>>  - remove patch "remove some double check", Geliang think it's unnecessary
> >>>
> >>> v8->v9:
> >>>  - Keep mptcp_add_addr_len unchanged.
> >>>  - populate opts->local or opts->remote after the length check, don't
> >>>    populate both of them.
> >>>  - add back 'echo' and 'port' arguments of mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal().
> >>>  - add a new arguments drop_other_suboptions for
> >>>    mptcp_pm_add_addr_signal(), and do the drop_other_suboptions check in it.
> >>>  - drop other suboptions in mptcp_established_options_add_addr() after the
> >>>    length check.
> >>>  - split the drop_other_suboptions code into a new patch.
> >>>  - add a new selftest case.
> >>>
> >>> Yonglong Li (6):
> >>>   mptcp: move drop_other_suboptions check under pm lock
> >>>   mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate
> >>>   mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other
> >>>   mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal
> >>>   mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT
> >>>   selftests: mptcp: add_addr and echo race test
> >>>
> >>>  include/net/mptcp.h                           |  3 +-
> >>>  net/mptcp/options.c                           | 54 +++++++++---------
> >>>  net/mptcp/pm.c                                | 57 +++++++++++++------
> >>>  net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c                        | 10 ++--
> >>>  net/mptcp/protocol.h                          | 24 ++++----
> >>>  .../testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh | 15 +++++
> >>>  6 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Li YongLong
> >
>
> --
> Li YongLong

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-19 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-16  3:04 [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 0/6] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 1/6] mptcp: move drop_other_suboptions check under pm lock Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04   ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 2/6] mptcp: make MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_ECHO separate Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04     ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 3/6] mptcp: fix ADD_ADDR and RM_ADDR maybe flush addr_signal each other Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04       ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 4/6] mptcp: build ADD_ADDR/echo-ADD_ADDR option according pm.add_signal Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04         ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 5/6] mptcp: remove MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_IPV6 and MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_PORT Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:04           ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 6/6] selftests: mptcp: add_addr and echo race test Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  3:12 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v9 mptcp-next 0/6] mptcp: fix conflicts when using pm.add_signal in ADD_ADDR/echo and RM_ADDR process Geliang Tang
2021-07-16  9:35 ` Yonglong Li
2021-07-16 10:13   ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-19  9:57     ` Yonglong Li
2021-07-19 10:02       ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2021-07-22  9:21 ` Matthieu Baerts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+WQbwv2RESX8MYjV1BugDHMDxVOMUKDu3xyOX9ho8+MQzHdAQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geliangtang@gmail.com \
    --cc=liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).