mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:45:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be269ef04813ede9084094b62f24d1fdcd7b91d0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cc57b70ec147b4c77610737241aeadf4150f323.1624854005.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 12:28 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patch added the MP_FAIL suboption sending support.
> 
> Add a new flag named send_mp_fail in struct mptcp_subflow_context. If
> this flag is set, send out MP_FAIL suboption.
> 
> Add a new member fail_seq in struct mptcp_out_options to save the data
> sequence number to put into the MP_FAIL suboption.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/net/mptcp.h  |  1 +
>  net/mptcp/options.c  | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  net/mptcp/protocol.h |  4 ++++
>  3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index cb580b06152f..f48d3b5a3fd4 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct mptcp_out_options {
>  	u32 nonce;
>  	u64 thmac;
>  	u32 token;
> +	u64 fail_seq;

Since we can't have both a valid mapping and MP_FAIL in the same
packet, it would be better to avoid increasing the 'mptcp_out_options'
size, e.g. re-using some ext_copy field, or unioning with some other
field.

mptcp_out_options has grown quite a bit and we should really look into
shrinking it.

>  	u8 hmac[20];
>  	struct mptcp_ext ext_copy;
>  #endif
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index b5850afea343..b78defe1aed9 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -771,6 +771,28 @@ static noinline void mptcp_established_options_rst(struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
>  	opts->reset_reason = subflow->reset_reason;
>  }
>  
> +static bool mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(struct sock *sk,
> +					      unsigned int *size,
> +					      unsigned int remaining,
> +					      struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
> +{
> +	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
> +
> +	if (!subflow->send_mp_fail)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (remaining < TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	*size = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL;
> +	opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL;
> +	opts->fail_seq = subflow->fail_seq;
> +
> +	pr_debug("MP_FAIL fail_seq=%llu", opts->fail_seq);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			       unsigned int *size, unsigned int remaining,
>  			       struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
> @@ -787,15 +809,29 @@ bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>  		return false;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(skb && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_RST)) {
> -		mptcp_established_options_rst(sk, skb, size, remaining, opts);
> +		if (mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(sk, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
> +			*size += opt_size;
> +			remaining -= opt_size;
> +		}
> +		mptcp_established_options_rst(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining, opts);
> +		*size += opt_size;
> +		remaining -= opt_size;
>  		return true;
>  	}
>  
>  	snd_data_fin = mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk);
>  	if (mptcp_established_options_mp(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts))
>  		ret = true;
> -	else if (mptcp_established_options_dss(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts))
> +	else if (mptcp_established_options_dss(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
>  		ret = true;
> +		if (opts->ext_copy.use_ack) {

Is the extra check on 'opts->ext_copy.use_ack' necessary? can we just
look for mp_fail?


> +			if (mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(sk, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
> +				*size += opt_size;
> +				remaining -= opt_size;
> +				ret = true;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
>  
>  	/* we reserved enough space for the above options, and exceeding the
>  	 * TCP option space would be fatal
> @@ -1334,6 +1370,20 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
>  				      opts->backup, TCPOPT_NOP);
>  	}
>  
> +	if (OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL & opts->suboptions) {
> +		const struct sock *ssk = (const struct sock *)tp;
> +		struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> +
> +		subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
> +		subflow->send_mp_fail = 0;
> +
> +		*ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_MP_FAIL,
> +				      TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL,
> +				      0, 0);
> +		put_unaligned_be64(opts->fail_seq, ptr);
> +		ptr += 2;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYN & opts->suboptions) {
>  		*ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_MP_JOIN,
>  				      TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPJ_SYN,
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 426ed80fe72f..007af5e4ba3d 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  #define OPTION_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE	BIT(8)
>  #define OPTION_MPTCP_PRIO	BIT(9)
>  #define OPTION_MPTCP_RST	BIT(10)
> +#define OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL	BIT(11)
>  
>  /* MPTCP option subtypes */
>  #define MPTCPOPT_MP_CAPABLE	0
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@
>  #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PRIO_ALIGN	4
>  #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE		12
>  #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RST		4
> +#define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL		12
>  
>  #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA_CSUM	(TCPOLEN_MPTCP_DSS_CHECKSUM + TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA)
>  
> @@ -417,6 +419,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
>  		mpc_map : 1,
>  		backup : 1,
>  		send_mp_prio : 1,
> +		send_mp_fail : 1,
>  		rx_eof : 1,
>  		can_ack : 1,        /* only after processing the remote a key */
>  		disposable : 1;	    /* ctx can be free at ulp release time */
> @@ -431,6 +434,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
>  	u8	reset_seen:1;
>  	u8	reset_transient:1;
>  	u8	reset_reason:4;
> +	u64	fail_seq;
>  
>  	long	delegated_status;
>  	struct	list_head delegated_node;   /* link into delegated_action, protected by local BH */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-28  4:28 [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 0/8] MP_FAIL support Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:28 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:28   ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 2/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption receiving Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:28     ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 3/8] mptcp: send out MP_FAIL when data checksum fail Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:29       ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 4/8] mptcp: add the mibs for MP_FAIL Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:29         ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 5/8] selftests: mptcp: add MP_FAIL mibs check Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:29           ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 6/8] mptcp: infinite mapping sending Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:29             ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 7/8] mptcp: infinite mapping receiving Geliang Tang
2021-06-28  4:29               ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 8/8] mptcp: add a mib for the infinite mapping sending Geliang Tang
2021-07-07 23:49               ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 7/8] mptcp: infinite mapping receiving Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:44             ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 6/8] mptcp: infinite mapping sending Mat Martineau
2021-07-08  0:44               ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:20       ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 3/8] mptcp: send out MP_FAIL when data checksum fail Mat Martineau
2021-07-13 12:44         ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-13 20:35           ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-14  3:56             ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-14 17:48               ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:07   ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending Mat Martineau
2021-07-14  8:45   ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2021-07-14  9:16     ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-14 15:49       ` Paolo Abeni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be269ef04813ede9084094b62f24d1fdcd7b91d0.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --subject='Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox