From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:45:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be269ef04813ede9084094b62f24d1fdcd7b91d0.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cc57b70ec147b4c77610737241aeadf4150f323.1624854005.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
On Mon, 2021-06-28 at 12:28 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> This patch added the MP_FAIL suboption sending support.
>
> Add a new flag named send_mp_fail in struct mptcp_subflow_context. If
> this flag is set, send out MP_FAIL suboption.
>
> Add a new member fail_seq in struct mptcp_out_options to save the data
> sequence number to put into the MP_FAIL suboption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/mptcp.h | 1 +
> net/mptcp/options.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/mptcp/protocol.h | 4 ++++
> 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/mptcp.h b/include/net/mptcp.h
> index cb580b06152f..f48d3b5a3fd4 100644
> --- a/include/net/mptcp.h
> +++ b/include/net/mptcp.h
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct mptcp_out_options {
> u32 nonce;
> u64 thmac;
> u32 token;
> + u64 fail_seq;
Since we can't have both a valid mapping and MP_FAIL in the same
packet, it would be better to avoid increasing the 'mptcp_out_options'
size, e.g. re-using some ext_copy field, or unioning with some other
field.
mptcp_out_options has grown quite a bit and we should really look into
shrinking it.
> u8 hmac[20];
> struct mptcp_ext ext_copy;
> #endif
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/options.c b/net/mptcp/options.c
> index b5850afea343..b78defe1aed9 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/options.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/options.c
> @@ -771,6 +771,28 @@ static noinline void mptcp_established_options_rst(struct sock *sk, struct sk_bu
> opts->reset_reason = subflow->reset_reason;
> }
>
> +static bool mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(struct sock *sk,
> + unsigned int *size,
> + unsigned int remaining,
> + struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
> +{
> + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(sk);
> +
> + if (!subflow->send_mp_fail)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (remaining < TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL)
> + return false;
> +
> + *size = TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL;
> + opts->suboptions |= OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL;
> + opts->fail_seq = subflow->fail_seq;
> +
> + pr_debug("MP_FAIL fail_seq=%llu", opts->fail_seq);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int *size, unsigned int remaining,
> struct mptcp_out_options *opts)
> @@ -787,15 +809,29 @@ bool mptcp_established_options(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> return false;
>
> if (unlikely(skb && TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_RST)) {
> - mptcp_established_options_rst(sk, skb, size, remaining, opts);
> + if (mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(sk, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
> + *size += opt_size;
> + remaining -= opt_size;
> + }
> + mptcp_established_options_rst(sk, skb, &opt_size, remaining, opts);
> + *size += opt_size;
> + remaining -= opt_size;
> return true;
> }
>
> snd_data_fin = mptcp_data_fin_enabled(msk);
> if (mptcp_established_options_mp(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts))
> ret = true;
> - else if (mptcp_established_options_dss(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts))
> + else if (mptcp_established_options_dss(sk, skb, snd_data_fin, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
> ret = true;
> + if (opts->ext_copy.use_ack) {
Is the extra check on 'opts->ext_copy.use_ack' necessary? can we just
look for mp_fail?
> + if (mptcp_established_options_mp_fail(sk, &opt_size, remaining, opts)) {
> + *size += opt_size;
> + remaining -= opt_size;
> + ret = true;
> + }
> + }
> + }
>
> /* we reserved enough space for the above options, and exceeding the
> * TCP option space would be fatal
> @@ -1334,6 +1370,20 @@ void mptcp_write_options(__be32 *ptr, const struct tcp_sock *tp,
> opts->backup, TCPOPT_NOP);
> }
>
> + if (OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL & opts->suboptions) {
> + const struct sock *ssk = (const struct sock *)tp;
> + struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> +
> + subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
> + subflow->send_mp_fail = 0;
> +
> + *ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_MP_FAIL,
> + TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL,
> + 0, 0);
> + put_unaligned_be64(opts->fail_seq, ptr);
> + ptr += 2;
> + }
> +
> if (OPTION_MPTCP_MPJ_SYN & opts->suboptions) {
> *ptr++ = mptcp_option(MPTCPOPT_MP_JOIN,
> TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPJ_SYN,
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 426ed80fe72f..007af5e4ba3d 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> #define OPTION_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE BIT(8)
> #define OPTION_MPTCP_PRIO BIT(9)
> #define OPTION_MPTCP_RST BIT(10)
> +#define OPTION_MPTCP_FAIL BIT(11)
>
> /* MPTCP option subtypes */
> #define MPTCPOPT_MP_CAPABLE 0
> @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@
> #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_PRIO_ALIGN 4
> #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FASTCLOSE 12
> #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_RST 4
> +#define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_FAIL 12
>
> #define TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA_CSUM (TCPOLEN_MPTCP_DSS_CHECKSUM + TCPOLEN_MPTCP_MPC_ACK_DATA)
>
> @@ -417,6 +419,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
> mpc_map : 1,
> backup : 1,
> send_mp_prio : 1,
> + send_mp_fail : 1,
> rx_eof : 1,
> can_ack : 1, /* only after processing the remote a key */
> disposable : 1; /* ctx can be free at ulp release time */
> @@ -431,6 +434,7 @@ struct mptcp_subflow_context {
> u8 reset_seen:1;
> u8 reset_transient:1;
> u8 reset_reason:4;
> + u64 fail_seq;
>
> long delegated_status;
> struct list_head delegated_node; /* link into delegated_action, protected by local BH */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-14 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-28 4:28 [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 0/8] MP_FAIL support Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:28 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:28 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 2/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption receiving Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:28 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 3/8] mptcp: send out MP_FAIL when data checksum fail Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:29 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 4/8] mptcp: add the mibs for MP_FAIL Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:29 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 5/8] selftests: mptcp: add MP_FAIL mibs check Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:29 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 6/8] mptcp: infinite mapping sending Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:29 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 7/8] mptcp: infinite mapping receiving Geliang Tang
2021-06-28 4:29 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 8/8] mptcp: add a mib for the infinite mapping sending Geliang Tang
2021-07-07 23:49 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 7/8] mptcp: infinite mapping receiving Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:44 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 6/8] mptcp: infinite mapping sending Mat Martineau
2021-07-08 0:44 ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:20 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 3/8] mptcp: send out MP_FAIL when data checksum fail Mat Martineau
2021-07-13 12:44 ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-13 20:35 ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-14 3:56 ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-14 17:48 ` Mat Martineau
2021-07-07 23:07 ` [MPTCP][PATCH v3 mptcp-next 1/8] mptcp: MP_FAIL suboption sending Mat Martineau
2021-07-14 8:45 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2021-07-14 9:16 ` Geliang Tang
2021-07-14 15:49 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be269ef04813ede9084094b62f24d1fdcd7b91d0.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=geliangtang@gmail.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).