mptcp.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
@ 2021-06-16  9:29 Paolo Abeni
  2021-06-17  0:13 ` Mat Martineau
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2021-06-16  9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp

The current cleanup rbuf tries a bit too hard to avoid acquiring
the subflow socket lock. We may end-up delaying the needed ack,
or skip acking a blocked subflow.

Address the above extending the conditions used to trigger the cleanup
to reflect more closely what TCP does and invoking tcp_cleanup_rbuf()
on all the active subflows.

Note that we can't replicate the exact tests implemented in
tcp_cleanup_rbuf(), as MPTCP lacks some of the required info - e.g.
ping-pong mode.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
---
v2 -> v3:
 - mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf() returns void
v1 -> v2:
 - access ssk icsk/tp state instead of msk (Mat)
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 net/mptcp/protocol.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 0a220862f62d..05c8382aafef 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -442,49 +442,46 @@ static void mptcp_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	}
 }
 
-static bool mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *ssk)
+static void mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *ssk)
 {
 	bool slow;
-	int ret;
 
 	slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
-	ret = tcp_can_send_ack(ssk);
-	if (ret)
+	if (tcp_can_send_ack(ssk))
 		tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, 1);
 	unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
-	return ret;
+}
+
+static bool mptcp_subflow_could_cleanup(const struct sock *ssk, bool rx_empty)
+{
+	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(ssk);
+	bool ack_pending = READ_ONCE(icsk->icsk_ack.pending);
+	const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
+
+	return (ack_pending & ICSK_ACK_SCHED) &&
+		((READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) - READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_wup) >
+		  READ_ONCE(icsk->icsk_ack.rcv_mss)) ||
+		 (rx_empty && ack_pending &
+			      (ICSK_ACK_PUSHED2 | ICSK_ACK_PUSHED)));
 }
 
 static void mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
-	struct sock *ack_hint = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_hint);
 	int old_space = READ_ONCE(msk->old_wspace);
 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
 	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
-	bool cleanup;
+	int space =  __mptcp_space(sk);
+	bool cleanup, rx_empty;
 
-	/* this is a simple superset of what tcp_cleanup_rbuf() implements
-	 * so that we don't have to acquire the ssk socket lock most of the time
-	 * to do actually nothing
-	 */
-	cleanup = __mptcp_space(sk) - old_space >= max(0, old_space);
-	if (!cleanup)
-		return;
+	cleanup = (space > 0) && (space >= (old_space << 1));
+	rx_empty = !atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
 
-	/* if the hinted ssk is still active, try to use it */
-	if (likely(ack_hint)) {
-		mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
-			struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
 
-			if (ack_hint == ssk && mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(ssk))
-				return;
-		}
+		if (cleanup || mptcp_subflow_could_cleanup(ssk, rx_empty))
+			mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(ssk);
 	}
-
-	/* otherwise pick the first active subflow */
-	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
-		if (mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow)))
-			return;
 }
 
 static bool mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
@@ -629,7 +626,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
 			break;
 		}
 	} while (more_data_avail);
-	WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_hint, ssk);
 
 	*bytes += moved;
 	return done;
@@ -1910,7 +1906,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 		__mptcp_update_rmem(sk);
 		done = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, &moved);
 		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-		tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, moved);
 
 		if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
 			__mptcp_error_report(sk);
@@ -1926,7 +1921,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 		ret |= __mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
 		__mptcp_splice_receive_queue(sk);
 		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-		mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(msk);
 	}
 	if (ret)
 		mptcp_check_data_fin((struct sock *)msk);
@@ -2175,9 +2169,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 	if (ssk == msk->last_snd)
 		msk->last_snd = NULL;
 
-	if (ssk == msk->ack_hint)
-		msk->ack_hint = NULL;
-
 	if (ssk == msk->first)
 		msk->first = NULL;
 
@@ -2392,7 +2383,6 @@ static int __mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
 	msk->rmem_released = 0;
 	msk->tx_pending_data = 0;
 
-	msk->ack_hint = NULL;
 	msk->first = NULL;
 	inet_csk(sk)->icsk_sync_mss = mptcp_sync_mss;
 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, mptcp_is_checksum_enabled(sock_net(sk)));
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
index 41f2957bf50c..2480db50cbd2 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
 	bool		use_64bit_ack; /* Set when we received a 64-bit DSN */
 	bool		csum_enabled;
 	spinlock_t	join_list_lock;
-	struct sock	*ack_hint;
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct sk_buff  *ooo_last_skb;
 	struct rb_root  out_of_order_queue;
-- 
2.26.3


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
  2021-06-16  9:29 [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf Paolo Abeni
@ 2021-06-17  0:13 ` Mat Martineau
  2021-06-17 13:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
  2021-06-18 17:35 ` Paolo Abeni
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mat Martineau @ 2021-06-17  0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni; +Cc: mptcp

On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:

> The current cleanup rbuf tries a bit too hard to avoid acquiring
> the subflow socket lock. We may end-up delaying the needed ack,
> or skip acking a blocked subflow.
>
> Address the above extending the conditions used to trigger the cleanup
> to reflect more closely what TCP does and invoking tcp_cleanup_rbuf()
> on all the active subflows.
>
> Note that we can't replicate the exact tests implemented in
> tcp_cleanup_rbuf(), as MPTCP lacks some of the required info - e.g.
> ping-pong mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf() returns void

Thanks for the v3, this looks ready to apply.

Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>


> v1 -> v2:
> - access ssk icsk/tp state instead of msk (Mat)
> ---
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> net/mptcp/protocol.h |  1 -
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> index 0a220862f62d..05c8382aafef 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
> @@ -442,49 +442,46 @@ static void mptcp_send_ack(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> 	}
> }
>
> -static bool mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *ssk)
> +static void mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(struct sock *ssk)
> {
> 	bool slow;
> -	int ret;
>
> 	slow = lock_sock_fast(ssk);
> -	ret = tcp_can_send_ack(ssk);
> -	if (ret)
> +	if (tcp_can_send_ack(ssk))
> 		tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, 1);
> 	unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow);
> -	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool mptcp_subflow_could_cleanup(const struct sock *ssk, bool rx_empty)
> +{
> +	const struct inet_connection_sock *icsk = inet_csk(ssk);
> +	bool ack_pending = READ_ONCE(icsk->icsk_ack.pending);
> +	const struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(ssk);
> +
> +	return (ack_pending & ICSK_ACK_SCHED) &&
> +		((READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_nxt) - READ_ONCE(tp->rcv_wup) >
> +		  READ_ONCE(icsk->icsk_ack.rcv_mss)) ||
> +		 (rx_empty && ack_pending &
> +			      (ICSK_ACK_PUSHED2 | ICSK_ACK_PUSHED)));
> }
>
> static void mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> {
> -	struct sock *ack_hint = READ_ONCE(msk->ack_hint);
> 	int old_space = READ_ONCE(msk->old_wspace);
> 	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
> 	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
> -	bool cleanup;
> +	int space =  __mptcp_space(sk);
> +	bool cleanup, rx_empty;
>
> -	/* this is a simple superset of what tcp_cleanup_rbuf() implements
> -	 * so that we don't have to acquire the ssk socket lock most of the time
> -	 * to do actually nothing
> -	 */
> -	cleanup = __mptcp_space(sk) - old_space >= max(0, old_space);
> -	if (!cleanup)
> -		return;
> +	cleanup = (space > 0) && (space >= (old_space << 1));
> +	rx_empty = !atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc);
>
> -	/* if the hinted ssk is still active, try to use it */
> -	if (likely(ack_hint)) {
> -		mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> -			struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
> +	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
> +		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
>
> -			if (ack_hint == ssk && mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(ssk))
> -				return;
> -		}
> +		if (cleanup || mptcp_subflow_could_cleanup(ssk, rx_empty))
> +			mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(ssk);
> 	}
> -
> -	/* otherwise pick the first active subflow */
> -	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
> -		if (mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf(mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow)))
> -			return;
> }
>
> static bool mptcp_check_data_fin(struct sock *sk)
> @@ -629,7 +626,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
> 			break;
> 		}
> 	} while (more_data_avail);
> -	WRITE_ONCE(msk->ack_hint, ssk);
>
> 	*bytes += moved;
> 	return done;
> @@ -1910,7 +1906,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> 		__mptcp_update_rmem(sk);
> 		done = __mptcp_move_skbs_from_subflow(msk, ssk, &moved);
> 		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
> -		tcp_cleanup_rbuf(ssk, moved);
>
> 		if (unlikely(ssk->sk_err))
> 			__mptcp_error_report(sk);
> @@ -1926,7 +1921,6 @@ static bool __mptcp_move_skbs(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
> 		ret |= __mptcp_ofo_queue(msk);
> 		__mptcp_splice_receive_queue(sk);
> 		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
> -		mptcp_cleanup_rbuf(msk);
> 	}
> 	if (ret)
> 		mptcp_check_data_fin((struct sock *)msk);
> @@ -2175,9 +2169,6 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
> 	if (ssk == msk->last_snd)
> 		msk->last_snd = NULL;
>
> -	if (ssk == msk->ack_hint)
> -		msk->ack_hint = NULL;
> -
> 	if (ssk == msk->first)
> 		msk->first = NULL;
>
> @@ -2392,7 +2383,6 @@ static int __mptcp_init_sock(struct sock *sk)
> 	msk->rmem_released = 0;
> 	msk->tx_pending_data = 0;
>
> -	msk->ack_hint = NULL;
> 	msk->first = NULL;
> 	inet_csk(sk)->icsk_sync_mss = mptcp_sync_mss;
> 	WRITE_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled, mptcp_is_checksum_enabled(sock_net(sk)));
> diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.h b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> index 41f2957bf50c..2480db50cbd2 100644
> --- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> +++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
> @@ -243,7 +243,6 @@ struct mptcp_sock {
> 	bool		use_64bit_ack; /* Set when we received a 64-bit DSN */
> 	bool		csum_enabled;
> 	spinlock_t	join_list_lock;
> -	struct sock	*ack_hint;
> 	struct work_struct work;
> 	struct sk_buff  *ooo_last_skb;
> 	struct rb_root  out_of_order_queue;
> -- 
> 2.26.3
>
>
>

--
Mat Martineau
Intel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
  2021-06-16  9:29 [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf Paolo Abeni
  2021-06-17  0:13 ` Mat Martineau
@ 2021-06-17 13:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
  2021-06-18 17:35 ` Paolo Abeni
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matthieu Baerts @ 2021-06-17 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paolo Abeni, mptcp

Hi Paolo, Mat,

On 16/06/2021 11:29, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The current cleanup rbuf tries a bit too hard to avoid acquiring
> the subflow socket lock. We may end-up delaying the needed ack,
> or skip acking a blocked subflow.
> 
> Address the above extending the conditions used to trigger the cleanup
> to reflect more closely what TCP does and invoking tcp_cleanup_rbuf()
> on all the active subflows.
> 
> Note that we can't replicate the exact tests implemented in
> tcp_cleanup_rbuf(), as MPTCP lacks some of the required info - e.g.
> ping-pong mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>

Thank you for the patch and the review!

Now in our tree (feature for net-next) with Mat's RvB tag:

- 7c5442f3e2bf: mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
- Results: 8db480094258..f40f6ff5a355

Builds and tests are now in progress:

https://cirrus-ci.com/github/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/export/20210617T132720
https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/workflows/build-validation.yml?query=branch:export/20210617T132720

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Tessares | Belgium | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
  2021-06-16  9:29 [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf Paolo Abeni
  2021-06-17  0:13 ` Mat Martineau
  2021-06-17 13:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
@ 2021-06-18 17:35 ` Paolo Abeni
  2021-06-21 10:50   ` Paolo Abeni
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2021-06-18 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp

On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 11:29 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> The current cleanup rbuf tries a bit too hard to avoid acquiring
> the subflow socket lock. We may end-up delaying the needed ack,
> or skip acking a blocked subflow.
> 
> Address the above extending the conditions used to trigger the cleanup
> to reflect more closely what TCP does and invoking tcp_cleanup_rbuf()
> on all the active subflows.
> 
> Note that we can't replicate the exact tests implemented in
> tcp_cleanup_rbuf(), as MPTCP lacks some of the required info - e.g.
> ping-pong mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
>  - mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf() returns void
> v1 -> v2:
>  - access ssk icsk/tp state instead of msk (Mat)

Darn me! it looks like this patch has some issues, that are almost
hidden by mptcp-level retrans. Investigating. I'll try to provide a
squash-to patch.

Meanwhile we should not send this one to netdev.

Thanks!

Paolo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf
  2021-06-18 17:35 ` Paolo Abeni
@ 2021-06-21 10:50   ` Paolo Abeni
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paolo Abeni @ 2021-06-21 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mptcp

On Fri, 2021-06-18 at 19:35 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-06-16 at 11:29 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > The current cleanup rbuf tries a bit too hard to avoid acquiring
> > the subflow socket lock. We may end-up delaying the needed ack,
> > or skip acking a blocked subflow.
> > 
> > Address the above extending the conditions used to trigger the cleanup
> > to reflect more closely what TCP does and invoking tcp_cleanup_rbuf()
> > on all the active subflows.
> > 
> > Note that we can't replicate the exact tests implemented in
> > tcp_cleanup_rbuf(), as MPTCP lacks some of the required info - e.g.
> > ping-pong mode.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2 -> v3:
> >  - mptcp_subflow_cleanup_rbuf() returns void
> > v1 -> v2:
> >  - access ssk icsk/tp state instead of msk (Mat)
> 
> Darn me! it looks like this patch has some issues, that are almost
> hidden by mptcp-level retrans. Investigating. I'll try to provide a
> squash-to patch.
> 
> Meanwhile we should not send this one to netdev.

Well, it looks like the issue I observer predates this change. The
point is: if we disable mptcp-level retrans, mptcp_connect.sh self-test 
in a loop hang on some lossy test-case (which is unexpected).

I *think* the solution is still in a better mptcp_cleanup_rbuf() -
which is eluding me since several iteration :(

/P



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-06-21 10:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-16  9:29 [PATCH v3 mptcp-next] mptcp: refine mptcp_cleanup_rbuf Paolo Abeni
2021-06-17  0:13 ` Mat Martineau
2021-06-17 13:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-06-18 17:35 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-06-21 10:50   ` Paolo Abeni

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).