From: "Dave, Tushar N" <tushar.n.dave@intel.com>
To: Li Yu <raise.sail@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
"e1000-devel@lists.sf.net" <e1000-devel@lists.sf.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mary Mcgrath <mary.mcgrath@oracle.com>
Subject: RE: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:43:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA8913348B0E7@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A311E9.9030702@gmail.com>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Li Yu [mailto:raise.sail@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 7:37 PM
>To: Dave, Tushar N
>Cc: Joe Jin; e1000-devel@lists.sf.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary Mcgrath
>Subject: Re: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>
>于 2012年11月09日 04:35, Dave, Tushar N 写道:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
>>> [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org]
>>> On Behalf Of Joe Jin
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:25 PM
>>> To: e1000-devel@lists.sf.net
>>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mary
>>> Mcgrath
>>> Subject: 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> IHAC reported "82571EB Detected Hardware Unit Hang" on HP ProLiant
>>> DL360 G6, and have to reboot the server to recover:
>>>
>>> e1000e 0000:06:00.1: eth3: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
>>> TDH <1a>
>>> TDT <1a>
>>> next_to_use <1a>
>>> next_to_clean <18>
>>> buffer_info[next_to_clean]:
>>> time_stamp <10047a74e>
>>> next_to_watch <18>
>>> jiffies <10047a88c>
>>> next_to_watch.status <1>
>>> MAC Status <80383>
>>> PHY Status <792d>
>>> PHY 1000BASE-T Status <3800>
>>> PHY Extended Status <3000>
>>> PCI Status <10>
>>>
>>> With newer kernel 2.0.0.1 the issue still reproducible.
>>>
>>> Device info:
>>> 06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit
>>> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
>>> 06:00.1 0200: 8086:10bc (rev 06)
>>>
>>> I compared lspci output before and after the issue, different as below:
>>> 06:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82571EB Gigabit
>>> Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06)
>>> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company NC364T PCI Express Quad Port
>>> Gigabit Server Adapter
>>> Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
>>> Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
>>> - Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>>> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
>>> + Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort-
>>> +<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx+
>>
>> Are you sure this is not similar issue as before that you reported.
>> i.e.
>> On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:51 +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
>>> I'm seeing a Unit Hang even with the latest e1000e driver 2.0.0 when
>>> doing scp test. this issue is easy do reproduced on SUN FIRE X2270
>>> M2, just copy a big file (>500M) from another server will hit it at
>once.
>>
>> All devices in path from root complex to 82571, should have *same* max
>payload size otherwise it can cause hang.
>> Can you double check this?
>>
>
>We also found such hang problem on 82599EB (ixgbe driver) in RHEL6.3
>kernel, we ever tried to upgrade to latest version (3.8.21 or 3.10.17),
>but it still happens.
>
>Is it probably also due to wrong "max payload size" set in BIOS?
>
It could be or could not be. I would suggest please create another thread with that issue as these two devices are significantly different.
-Tushar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-14 3:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-08 6:24 82571EB: Detected Hardware Unit Hang Joe Jin
2012-11-08 20:35 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-09 1:22 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 2:47 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 3:45 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-15 0:32 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-15 20:26 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-19 5:38 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-20 8:59 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-26 16:23 ` [E1000-devel] " Fujinaka, Todd
2012-11-27 0:59 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-27 2:06 ` Mary Mcgrath
2012-11-27 17:32 ` [E1000-devel] " Fujinaka, Todd
2012-11-27 18:10 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-11-27 18:24 ` Fujinaka, Todd
2012-11-28 8:31 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-28 15:53 ` Fujinaka, Todd
2012-11-29 3:10 ` Ethan Zhao
2012-11-29 15:52 ` Fujinaka, Todd
2012-12-19 3:04 ` Joe Jin
2012-12-19 5:52 ` Yijing Wang
2012-12-19 6:13 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-20 13:24 ` Joe Jin
2012-11-14 3:37 ` Li Yu
2012-11-14 3:43 ` Dave, Tushar N [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-07-09 8:51 Joe Jin
2012-07-09 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-07-09 12:19 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-10 7:40 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-10 18:14 ` Wyborny, Carolyn
2012-07-10 19:02 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-10 19:17 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 0:34 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 1:18 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 1:44 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 3:22 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 3:29 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 4:05 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 5:03 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:11 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:17 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:37 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:38 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 7:50 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-11 7:53 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-11 18:51 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 2:23 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 2:52 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 2:57 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 3:07 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 3:12 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 5:57 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 6:16 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 6:41 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 7:10 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-12 18:19 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-12 23:46 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-13 4:10 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-13 4:33 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-15 3:42 ` Dave, Tushar N
2012-07-15 3:52 ` Joe Jin
2012-07-15 13:35 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-16 15:47 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-07-16 16:08 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2012-07-17 4:48 ` Jon Mason
2012-07-17 4:45 ` Jon Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=061C8A8601E8EE4CA8D8FD6990CEA8913348B0E7@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tushar.n.dave@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sf.net \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mary.mcgrath@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raise.sail@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).