From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [held lock freed] Re: [GIT] Networking
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:55:32 +0100
Message-ID: <1300719332.2884.370.camel@edumazet-laptop>
References: <20110320.195156.226769634.davem@davemloft.net>
	 <20110321125320.GA23490@elte.hu>
	 <1300714346.2884.284.camel@edumazet-laptop>
	 <201103211550.10694.arnd@arndb.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:39247 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753310Ab1CUO4P (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:56:15 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201103211550.10694.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Le lundi 21 mars 2011 =C3=A0 15:50 +0100, Arnd Bergmann a =C3=A9crit :
> On Monday 21 March 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > [PATCH] ipx: fix ipx_release()
> >=20
> > Commit b0d0d915d1d1a0 (remove the BKL) added a regression, because
> > sock_put() can free memory while we are going to use it later.
> >=20
> > Fix is to delay sock_put() after release_sock().
> >=20
> > Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>=20
> Your fix looks good, thanks Eric!
>=20
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>=20
> I believe I made the same mistake in atalk_release and x25_release:
>=20
> 8<------------
> net: fix atalk_release and x25_release
>=20
> The recent BKL removal has introduced a use-after-free problem
> in multiple network protocols. This fixes the problem in appletalk
> and x25 by ensuring that we call the final sock_put() after
> releasing the socket lock.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>


> diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> index 4680b1e..b2cf1db 100644
> --- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
> +++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
> @@ -669,8 +669,8 @@ static int x25_release(struct socket *sock)
> =20
>  	sock_orphan(sk);
>  out:
> -	release_sock(sk);
>  	sock_put(sk);
> +	release_sock(sk);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> =20

Hmm, x25_release() looks fine, I believe no fix is needed.