On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 11:41 +0800, hayeswang wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Hutchings [mailto:ben@decadent.org.uk] 
> > > +File: rtl_nic/rtl8168e-3.fw (Version: rtl8168e-3_0.0.1)
> > [...]
> > 
> > Please don't write the version in yet another way.  It should be:
> > 
> 
> I just think if someone replaces the firmware with another one, I could check
> the firmware through the information without checking the ram data.
> For example, someone renames the rtl8168f-1.fw to rtl8168e-3.fw and replaces the
> original rtl8168e-3.fw. Through ethtool to show the version of the firmware, I
> could know the firmware is invalid. If the version only contain the value 0.0.1,
> I must compare the binary file to find out the result.
[...]

You're talking about the version string inside the firmware file.  I see
the value of including the name there.  However, in the WHENCE file it
is redundant.

But I really don't care that much.

Ben.