From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Stable regression with 'tcp: allow splice() to build full TSO packets' Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 23:50:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1337291410.3403.52.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20120517121800.GA18052@1wt.eu> <1337287279.3403.44.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120517211414.GP14498@1wt.eu> <1337290822.3403.47.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Willy Tarreau Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:48950 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761163Ab2EQVuO (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 May 2012 17:50:14 -0400 Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2273152wib.1 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 14:50:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1337290822.3403.47.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2012-05-17 at 23:40 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > I dont understand why we should tcp_push() if we sent 0 bytes in this > splice() call. > > The push() should have be done already by prior splice() call, dont you > think ? > > out: > if (copied && !(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)) > tcp_push(sk, flags, mss_now, tp->nonagle); > I think I now understand One splice() syscall actually calls do_tcp_sendpages() several times (N). Problem is N-1 calls are done with MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST set And last one with MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST unset So maybe we should replace this test by : if (!(flags & MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST)) tcp_push(...);