From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 08:29:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367422195.11020.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130501151752.GA7521@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:46:37AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > If the only goal is to allow preemption, and if long grace periods are
> > not a concern, then this alternate approach would work fine as well.
>
> Hmm.. if that were the goal I'd like it to have a different name;
> cond_resched*() has always been about preemption.
BTW, I do not remember why cond_resched() is not an empty macro
when CONFIG_PREEMPT=y ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 2:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper Simon Horman
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:12 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-04-30 7:29 ` Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 12:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2013-05-01 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 19:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-02 10:06 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 15:54 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 18:55 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 20:19 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 22:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-03 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:47 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 7:23 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when dumping connections Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367422195.11020.46.camel@edumazet-glaptop \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).