From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: updates to syncookies - timestamps not needed any more (freebsd) Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:00:19 -0700 Message-ID: <1373648419.10804.32.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130708160421.GA9763@order.stressinduktion.org> <20130711.165726.2168148122875413191.davem@davemloft.net> <20130712014138.GD12611@order.stressinduktion.org> <51E01F2A.3030602@hp.com> <1373645937.10804.19.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <51E02FF7.3070608@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: richard -rw- weinberger , David Miller , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Rick Jones Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:48645 "EHLO mail-pa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965035Ab3GLRAV (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:00:21 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id kq13so9072610pab.39 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:00:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51E02FF7.3070608@hp.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2013-07-12 at 09:33 -0700, Rick Jones wrote: > Tsk, tsk, tsk... or am I believing too strongly in the importance of > protection against wrapped sequence numbers? Presumably Microsoft do not expect their machines being able to transfer TCP at high speed...