From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ip: initialize hash list Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:15:58 -0700 Message-ID: <1374506158.4990.11.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130720102657.768a11ea@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1374342380.1940.2.camel@joe-AO722> <20130722075245.70310bfa@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1374505616.2061.40.camel@joe-AO722> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Pravin B Shelar , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com ([209.85.220.54]:40586 "EHLO mail-pa0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755213Ab3GVPQE (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:16:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx10so7188635pab.41 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:16:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1374505616.2061.40.camel@joe-AO722> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 08:06 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 07:52 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:46:20 -0700 > > Joe Perches wrote: > [] > > > Are you doing to do just this one or submit a series? > > > > Hadn't planned on fixing more than one. And would not go outside code > > that I actually use. > > What a pity. > > I think if you identify what you believe is a > trivial defect in your own code, it's both > polite and social to fix similar defects in > other code too. Joe, I find this quite misplaced. So far, there is no bug. What about fixing real bugs instead ?