From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: TCP_NOSENT_LOWAT socket option Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:28:01 -0700 Message-ID: <1374521281.4990.34.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1374520422.4990.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , Yuchung Cheng , Neal Cardwell , Michael Kerrisk To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com ([209.85.220.44]:53999 "EHLO mail-pa0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932676Ab3GVT2F (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:28:05 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id lj1so7410410pab.3 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:28:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1374520422.4990.33.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 12:13 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote: > TCP_NOSENT_LOWAT For an unknown reason, this was spelled incorrectly I'll send a V2 with TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT