From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: Helmut Grohne <h.grohne@cygnusnetworks.de>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] tuntap: allow overriding ethtool driver info
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:36:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374788182.3058.32.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130725143206.03f4975a@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 14:32 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:19:17 +0100
> Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 17:16 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 00:48:07 +0100
> > > Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:13 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > > > This patch adds new ioctl to allow setting the ethtool information
> > > > > returned by the TUN device. This is useful when using tun device as a surrogate
> > > > > for hardware or other software emulation.
> > > >
> > > > I don't like this idea. Which tools are you trying to fool? How does
> > > > this work when you don't implement any driver-specific behaviour (e.g.
> > > > SIOCDEVPRIVATE) they expect?
> > >
> > > We use surrogate interfaces in user mode application and want to
> > > display different information for these than the normal TUN device.
> >
> > What is the problem that can't be solved purely in userland?
> >
> > Ben.
> >
>
> There applications (like SNMP) that use ethtool info.
Huh, I never expected they would record the driver and version. So you
want them to report the userland software name and version? I can sort
of see how this might be useful as part of a test harness, but I would
hate to see this get used in production. Users ought to be able to
trust that 'ethtool -i' shows them the kernel driver information.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-25 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-24 23:11 [PATCH net-next 1/3] tuntap: allow changing ethtool speed (v2) Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-24 23:13 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] tuntap: allow overriding ethtool driver info Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-24 23:48 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-25 0:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-25 21:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-07-25 21:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-25 21:36 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2013-07-25 21:56 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-24 23:15 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] tuntap: allow overriding link statistics Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-24 23:40 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] tuntap: allow changing ethtool speed (v2) Ben Hutchings
2013-07-25 0:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2013-07-25 0:29 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1374788182.3058.32.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=h.grohne@cygnusnetworks.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).