From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: low latency/busy poll feedback and bugs Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:23:25 -0700 Message-ID: <1375907005.4004.47.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <20130805212257.GB6904@sbohrermbp13-local.rgmadvisors.com> <5200A8BC.4010402@linux.intel.com> <20130806180806.GA8993@sbohrermbp13-local.rgmadvisors.com> <52013F9A.9020005@linux.intel.com> <1375905901.27403.22.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eliezer Tamir , Shawn Bohrer , Amir Vadai , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Ben Hutchings Return-path: Received: from mail-pb0-f51.google.com ([209.85.160.51]:35336 "EHLO mail-pb0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343Ab3HGUX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:23:26 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id jt11so2299205pbb.38 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 13:23:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1375905901.27403.22.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 22:05 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > It seems like sk_mark_napi_id() should only be called on connected > sockets for now. I concur.