From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: Suspicious RCU usage in bridge with Linux v4.0-9362-g1fc149933fd4 Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:06:07 -0700 Message-ID: <1430777167.27254.8.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20150504133943.GA17043@x131e> <1430772572.27254.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dominick Grift , netdev To: Cong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]:36131 "EHLO mail-ig0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750992AbbEDWGI (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2015 18:06:08 -0400 Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so96417870igb.1 for ; Mon, 04 May 2015 15:06:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 14:38 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > Compile-test only patch is never ready for review, I thought it is too obvious > to mention. Thats not relevant. Obvious or not, you are not making things easy for reviewers. Our time is precious too, even if you believe its a minor detail. If you don't care for our feedback, send private patches. When I hit 'Reply' to your mail, I don't have the patch available at hand, and need to copy/paste it. Surely I am not alone. Surely you can change the way you provide patches, even if they are in RFC state. If you don't have time, just ignore these bug reports, and do whatever you need to, nobody will complain.